SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(P&H) 1236

ARUN KUMAR TYAGI
Shivansh – Appellant
Versus
State Of Haryana – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Mr. U.K. Agnihotri, Advocate for the Appellant; Mr. Ranvir Singh Arya, Addl. A.G., Haryana for the respondent-State, for the Respondent

JUDGMENT

Arun Kumar Tyagi, J. (Oral). - (The case has been taken up for hearing through video conferencing.)

2. The petitioner has filed the present revision petition under Section 102 of the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015 (for short, “the JJ Act”) read with Section 401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for short, "the Cr.P.C.") for setting aside the impugned order dated 15.10.2020 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge (Fast Track Special Court under POCSO Act), Yamuna Nagar at Jagadhri in Criminal Appeal No.135 of 2020 upholding order dated 25.09.2020 passed by learned Principal Magistrate, Juvenile Justice Board, Yamuna Nagar at Jagadhri dismissing the application for grant of regular bail to the petitioner in case FIR No.115 dated 22.03.2020 registered under Sections 379-B and 201 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (for short, "the IPC") in Police Station Sadar, Yamuna Nagar.

3. Briefly stated the facts giving rise to the filing of the present revision petition are that the above said FIR was registered on statement of Krishan Lal. In his statement Krishan Lal alleged that on 21.03.2020 when after parking his truck at Matka Chowk, Jagadhri he

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top