SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Jhk) 455

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY, J
Payal Devi @ Payal Kumari – Appellant
Versus
State of Jharkhand – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :Mr. Raj Nandan Chatterjee, Advocate
For the Respondent: Mr. Abhay Kr. Tiwari, Addl. P.P.

JUDGMENT :

By the Court:-

1. Heard the parties.

2. This criminal miscellaneous petition has been filed invoking the jurisdiction of this Court under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 with a prayer to quash the order dated 03.03.2025 passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate -1st Class, Dhanbad whereby and where under, the learned Judicial Magistrate -1st Class, Dhanbad has directed for issuance of non- bailable warrant of arrest and also to quash the order dated 05.04.2025 by which the said learned Judicial Magistrate -1st Class, Dhanbad has ordered for issuance of proclamation under Section 84 of B.N.S.S., 2023 in connection with Barwadda P.S. Case No. 02 of 2025 involving the offences punishable under Sections 115(2)/ 118(1)/ 117(2)/ 109/ 76/ 303(2)/3(5) of B.N.S., 2023.

3. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners that Section 75 of Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 empowers the Chief Judicial Magistrate or the Magistrate of the First Class to direct a warrant to any person within his local inter-alia jurisdiction for arrest of any person who is accused of a non-bailable offence and is evading arrest. It is next submitted that the learne

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

PAYAL DEVI ALIAS PAYAL KUMARI vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND - 2025 Supreme(Online)(Jhk) 1203 – Establishes the requirement for a magistrate to demonstrate legal criteria (evasion of arrest, time/place for appearance) before issuing non‑bailable warrants. The language indicates the case sets a standard that is likely followed in subsequent decisions.

Bhekhlal Yadav @ Bheklal Yadav @ Bhekhlal Gop vs State of Jharkhand - 2025 0 Supreme(Jhk) 598 – States that issuance of non‑bailable warrants must comply with legal standards, requiring an execution report and clear directives for appearance. This reinforces procedural requirements and suggests the case’s rule is upheld in later jurisprudence.

Damodar Choudhary, son of Janki Choudhary vs State of Jharkhand - 2025 0 Supreme(Jhk) 617 – Explicitly notes that the court "upheld the Chief Judicial Magistrate’s order" for a proclamation under Section 82 of Cr.P.C., affirming that sufficient grounds existed based on the accused’s concealment. The wording "upheld" signals that the decision was affirmed rather than overruled.

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top