IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
Anil Kumar Choudhary
Imtiyaz Ansari @ Imteyaz Ansari – Appellant
Versus
State of Jharkhand – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.
1. Heard the parties.
2. This criminal miscellaneous petition has been filed invoking the jurisdiction of this Court under Section 528 of B.N.S.S., 2023 with a prayer to quash the entire criminal proceeding of Complaint Case No. 1437 of 2021 of the court of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Dhanbad, including the order taking cognizance dated 13.10.2023, passed in the said Complaint Case No. 1437 of 2021 whereby and where the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Dhanbad has taken cognizance of the offences punishable under Section 323/341/34 of Indian Penal, now pending in the court of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Dhanbad.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned counsel for the opposite party no.2 jointly drawing attention of this Court to the Interlocutory Application No.1881 of 2025 which is supported by separate affidavits of the petitioner nos. 1, 2 & 3 as well as of the complainant-opposite party no. 2 submits that therein it has been mentioned that the parties have compromised the matter. It is further jointly submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned counsel for th
The High Court can quash criminal proceedings based on a compromise between parties when the offences are not heinous and the possibility of conviction is remote.
The High Court can quash criminal proceedings based on amicable settlement between parties, especially when the offences are not heinous and continuation would cause hardship.
The High Court can quash criminal proceedings under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure when a private dispute is settled, and the possibility of conviction is remote.
The High Court can quash criminal proceedings based on compromise in private disputes if it serves justice and prevents abuse of process.
The High Court may quash criminal proceedings when parties reach a compromise, particularly in non-heinous offences, as continuation of proceedings may cause undue hardship.
The High Court can quash FIRs in cases of private disputes that have been amicably settled, preventing abuse of process and securing justice.
The High Court can quash criminal proceedings if the parties have settled their dispute, and continuation would be an abuse of process, particularly in non-heinous cases.
The High Court has the jurisdiction to quash criminal proceedings based on a compromise between parties, especially in private disputes where continuation would amount to an abuse of process.
High Court quashed non-heinous petty private dispute proceedings on compromise, as conviction remote and continuation abuses process, causing oppression despite settlement.
The High Court may quash criminal proceedings based on a compromise between parties if the dispute is private, not heinous, and continuation of proceedings would cause injustice.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.