Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
Bablu Yadav – Appellant
Versus
State of Jharkhand – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY, J.
Heard the parties.
2. This Criminal Miscellaneous Petition has been filed invoking the jurisdiction of this Court under Section 528 of the BNSS, 2023 with the prayer to quash the entire criminal proceeding in connection with Telaiya P.S. Case No.384 of 2025 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 352 , 351(2), 115(2), 126(2), 127(2), 308(5) & 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita 2023 and the said case is now pending before the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Koderma.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the opposite party No.2 jointly draw the attention of this Court towards Interlocutory Application No.2869 of 2026 which is supported by the separate affidavits of the father of the opposite party No.2/informant and the brother of the petitioner no.2 and the Pairvikar of the petitioners wherein it has been mentioned that a compromise has been entered into between the petitioners and the opposite party No.2. It is next submitted that the informant has no grievance against the petitioners. It is next jointly submitted that good sense has prevailed between the parties after intervention of the friends
High Court quashed non-heinous petty private dispute proceedings on compromise, as conviction remote and continuation abuses process, causing oppression despite settlement.
High Court quashed non-heinous private dispute criminal proceedings upon voluntary compromise, as continuation would abuse process, render conviction remote, and cause prejudice, following guidelines....
The High Court may quash criminal proceedings based on a compromise between parties if the dispute is private, not heinous, and continuation of proceedings would cause injustice.
The High Court can quash criminal proceedings based on a compromise between parties when the offences are not heinous and the possibility of conviction is remote.
High Court quashed proceedings for non-heinous offences on parties' compromise in private dispute, as continuation abuses process, conviction remote, securing ends of justice per Supreme Court guidel....
The High Court can quash criminal proceedings under Section 482 of the Code when a compromise between parties suggests that continuation would be unjust or oppressive, provided the offenses are not h....
The High Court can quash criminal proceedings under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure if the parties have settled their disputes, provided the offences are not heinous and the continuatio....
The High Court may quash criminal proceedings when parties reach a compromise, particularly in non-heinous offences, as continuation of proceedings may cause undue hardship.
The court can quash criminal proceedings under Section 482 of the CrPC when parties settle their dispute, especially in cases with a civil nature, preventing abuse of process.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
