Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY
Rahat Sayeed Khan, son of Sahid Syed Khan – Appellant
Versus
Prakash I. Thakkar – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY, J.
1. This appeal has been filed by defendant nos. 6 and 7 of the suit against the judgment and decree dated 28.02.2023 (decree signed on 13.03.2023) passed by learned Civil Judge, Senior Division, Chandil in Title Suit No. 13 of 2014 whereby the suit has been partly decreed and the registered sale-deed no. 687 dated 06.03.2012 executed by defendant no. 5 (the power of attorney holder of defendant nos. 1 to 4- the legal heirs of late Manikant G. Thakkar ) in favour of the defendant nos. 6 and 7 has been set- aside. The other sale deed no. 4324 dated 20.10.2012 executed by the defendant no.8 in favour of the Defendant no.9 was held to be valid.
2. The appellants were the defendant nos. 6 and 7 in the Title Suit No. 13 of 2014. The present respondent nos. 1 to 4 were the plaintiff nos. 2 to 5 before the learned trial Court. The plaintiff no.1 was the mother of the plaintiff no. 2 to 5 and her name was deleted on account of her death. The appellants are only concerned with registered sale-deed no. 687 dated06.03.2012 executed by defendant no.5 being the power of attorney holder of defendant no. 1 to 4 in favour of the defendant nos. 6 and 7 (the appella
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
