Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY
Ram Khelawan Mallah @ Ram Khelawan Nishad – Appellant
Versus
Basanti Devi, wife of late Munilal Karmakar – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. filing of the suit and its procedural background. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. understanding the basis of the plaintiffs' claim over the disputed land. (Para 4 , 18) |
| 3. arguments presented by appellants regarding title. (Para 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 4. arguments of respondents citing sections of the indian evidence act. (Para 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 5. defendants' counterarguments regarding land ownership. (Para 14 , 15) |
| 6. trial court's findings based on evidence and document analysis. (Para 19 , 20 , 21 , 22) |
| 7. issues regarding the validity of settlement deed recitals. (Para 25 , 26 , 27) |
| 8. legal principles regarding the presumption of registered deeds and the onus of proof. (Para 30) |
| 9. interpretation of evidentiary presumptions in relation to documents. (Para 31 , 32 , 33) |
| 10. legal principles established regarding documents. (Para 34 , 35 , 36) |
| 11. final judgment and decree concerning appellants' claims. (Para 37 , 38 , 39 , 40) |
JUDGMENT :
(Anubha Rawat Choudhary, J.)
1. This second appeal has been filed by the defendants of the suit against the judgment and decree dated 22nd July 2019 (decree signed on 27.07.2019) passed in Civil Appeal No. 151 of 2018 by the learned District Judge-XIV, Dhanbad where
The presumption of truth in registered documents does not extend to factual accuracy of recitals; parties must substantiate claims with evidence.
A registered sale deed, while presumptive, does not confer title over property without substantiated evidence of prior ownership and possession.
The presumption of correctness of entries in the record of rights under the Bihar Land Reforms Act is rebuttable, and mere possession does not confer title without proof of vendor's title.
The registered document operates from the date of execution, and a party with unclean hands is not entitled to declaratory relief.
The court upheld the admissibility of historical tenancy documents under Section 90 of the Evidence Act, confirming the plaintiffs' rights over the land despite challenges regarding document validity....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
