Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
SUJIT NARAYAN PRASAD, PRADEEP KUMAR SRIVASTAVA
Geeta Devi, W/o Bablu Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Jharkhand – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
I.A. No.2192 of 2025
1.The instant interlocutory application has been filed on behalf of appellant under Section 430(1) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 for suspension of sentence dated 04.10.2024 passed by learned Special Judge, (NDPS) East-Singhbhum, Jamshedpur in connection with N.D.P.S. Case No.60 of 2023, arising out of Bagbera P.S. Case No.22 of 2023 whereby and whereunder, the appellant has been convicted for the offences under Sections 20(b)(ii)(C) and Section 29 of the N.D.P.S. Act and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment (R.I.) for 10 years with fine of Rs.1,00,000/- and in default of payment of fine, further R.I. for 6 months.
2. It has been contended on behalf of the appellant that even accepting the prosecution version to be true in the entirety then also no case under Sections 20(b)(ii)(C) and 29 of the N.D.P.S. Act is made out so as to attract the penal offence under the N.D.P.S. Act.
3. It has been contended that as per the prosecution, the contraband has been recovered not within the periphery of the house rather it has been found in the passage just outside the house of the present appellant where so many houses are there. Hence, mainl
The location of contraband recovery outside a residence creates grounds for suspension of sentence under the N.D.P.S. Act when it raises questions about culpability.
Doubts in the prosecution's case regarding the seizure of contraband justified the suspension of the appellant's sentence.
The court upheld the conviction under the NDPS Act, emphasizing compliance with statutory provisions and the sufficiency of evidence linking the appellant to the crime.
The absence of narcotic recovery from the appellant's possession creates reasonable doubt, justifying the suspension of the sentence.
Suspension of sentence requires clear demonstration of trial errors or reasonable doubts about conviction, which the applicant failed to establish.
Compliance with statutory procedures during search and seizure is essential for maintaining the integrity of evidence in drug-related offenses.
Procedural irregularities in sampling under the N.D.P.S Rules do not negate the validity of seizure and testing if properly conducted.
Compliance with procedural safeguards under the NDPS Act is essential for the validity of convictions and can lead to suspension of sentences if violated.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
