IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY, J
Pawan Rout, Son Of Soudagar Rout – Appellant
Versus
Shanti Kumrain, Wife Of Late Khakhani, @ Chandan Kumar – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY, J.
This Second Appeal has been filed against the judgment dated 29.09.2018 (decree signed on 05.10.2018) passed by learned District Judge – I, Dumka in Civil Appeal No.17 of 2012 whereby the appeal has been allowed and the judgment and decree dated 20.07.2012 (decree signed on 02.08.2012) passed by learned Senior Civil Judge – I, Dumka in Title Suit No.03 of 2008 has been reversed. The learned trial court was pleased to dismiss the plaintiffs' suit. The defendant no.1 is the appellant before this Court.
2. This appeal was admitted for hearing vide order dated 13.06.2023 on the following substantial questions of law:
"1. Whether the learned First Appellate Court committed gross illegality by ignoring the fact that the suit was hopelessly barred by limitation?
2. Whether the learned First Appellate Court failed to consider the fact the plaintiff no. 2, could not have been arrayed as such, when the plaintiff no. 1 was making the prayer for cancellation of adoption of defendant no. 1 and the plaintiff no. 2, has no other right except that he is one of the adopted son of plaintiff no. 1?
3. Whether the learned First Appellate Court committed gross illegality
The court upheld the validity of a registered adoption deed, emphasizing that the suit challenging it was barred by limitation as it was filed 33 years after the plaintiffs gained knowledge of the ad....
Point of law: Capacity of a male Hindu to take in adoption-Any male Hindu who is of sound mind and is not a minor has the capacity to take a son or a daughter in adoption. Provided that, if he has a ....
Fraud in the alteration of an adoption deed justifies a declaration of nullity; suit filed within the limitation period after discovery of fraud is valid.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the adoption deed was obtained by fraud and misrepresentation, and the physical act of giving and taking of adoption did not take place in acc....
The quality of evidence is more important than the quantity, and witnesses must be given an opportunity to explain any doubts raised about their statements.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the validity of the adoption deed and the plaintiff's lack of locus standi to question the adoption.
Fiscal entries like mutation do not represent or create any title or interest property.
[The validity of an adoption deed requires adherence to legal formalities, including proper ceremonies, and knowledge of such deeds impacts the limitation period for challenging them.]
The central legal point established in the judgment is the requirement to prove adoption strictly in accordance with the provisions of the Hindu Adoptions and Maintenance Act, 1956, including the con....
The burden of proof lies on the claimant to establish valid adoption as per statutory requirements; registered deeds are rebuttable and do not eliminate the need for actual proof.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.