Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRASAD, J
Chandan Kumar Saha, Son Of Santosh Kumar Saha – Appellant
Versus
State Of Jharkhand – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
SANJAY PRASAD, J.
I. A. No. 6753 of 2024
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State and learned counsel for the opposite party no. 2.
2. The instant I.A. No. 6753 of 2024 has been filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act for condoning the delay of 182 days in filing the instant Cr. Revision No. 795 of 2024.
3. It has been submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that there is delay of 182 days in filing the Cr. Revision No. 795 of 2024. It is submitted that a cheque of Rs. 50,000/- was dishonored and after dismissal of this Criminal Revision, the petitioner is in custody since 14.06.2024 and the petitioner is ready to compromise the case with the opposite party no. 2 and as such, delay of 182 days in preferring the instant Criminal Revision Application may be condoned.
4. Learned counsel for the State raised no objection.
5. Learned counsel for the opposite party no. 2 also raised no objection.
6. Having gone through the averments made at para- 4 and 5 of the instant Interlocutory Application and also considering the factum of compromise and taking lenient view, the delay of 182 days in preferring the instant Cr. Revision No. 795 of
The court condoned a 182-day delay in filing a Criminal Revision due to compromise and allowed the substitution of legal heirs following the death of a party, emphasizing leniency in procedural matte....
The court condoned a 588-day delay in filing a Criminal Revision under the Limitation Act due to the petitioner's custody and financial constraints, emphasizing leniency in such circumstances.
The court condoned a 212-day delay in filing a Criminal Revision Application based on the petitioner's financial hardship and ignorance of prior judgments, granting provisional bail during the appeal....
The court condoned a significant delay in filing a revision application and granted bail based on the petitioner's lengthy custody and the circumstances of the case.
A court may grant bail considering the duration of custody, despite serious charges, when supported by comparable cases.
The court condoned the delay in filing a Criminal Revision Application and granted bail to the petitioner, emphasizing the need for conditions to prevent further criminal conduct.
The court emphasized that delays due to incarceration can justify condoning application timing, especially amid disputes over complaint legitimacy.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
