Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
Sanjay Prasad, J
Dablu Mishra @ Ranjit Mishra – Appellant
Versus
State Of Jharkhand – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
SANJAY PRASAD, J.
I.A. No.7341 of 2024
I.A. No.7341 of 2024 has been filed on behalf of the petitioner under Section 5 of the Limitation Act for condoning the delay of 1209 days.
2. It is submitted that the petitioner has no knowledge of dismissal of appeal and he was outside station and he is in custody since 07.03.2024 and hence delay of 1209 may be condoned.
3. Learned APP has raised objection.
4. Having heard learned counsel for both the sides and in view of the averments made in paragraph nos.6 to 10 of the I.A. No. 7341 of 2024, the delay of 1209 days in filing the instant Criminal Revision Application is condoned.
5. Thus, I.A. No. 7341 of 2024 is allowed and stands disposed of.
I.A. (Cr.)No.845 of 2025
6. This Criminal Revision Application has been filed on behalf of the petitioner challenging the judgment dated 05.12.2018 passed by Sri Ram Bachan Singh, learned Additional Sessions Judge-I, Ghatsila in Cr. Appeal No.222 of 2018 by which the appeal filed on behalf of the appellant has been dismissed thereby affirming the judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 13.08.2018 passed by Sri Mukulesh Chandnra Narain, learned A.C.J.M, Ghatshila, East Singhbhum in Ghats
The court condoned a significant delay in filing a revision application and granted bail based on the petitioner's lengthy custody and the circumstances of the case.
A court may grant bail considering the duration of custody, despite serious charges, when supported by comparable cases.
The court condoned the delay in filing a Criminal Revision Application and granted bail to the petitioner, emphasizing the need for conditions to prevent further criminal conduct.
The court condoned a 588-day delay in filing a Criminal Revision under the Limitation Act due to the petitioner's custody and financial constraints, emphasizing leniency in such circumstances.
Delay in filing appeals may be excused under the Limitation Act when supported by justifiable reasons, and prolonged custody may warrant bail during pending revisions.
The court condoned a 182-day delay in filing a Criminal Revision due to compromise and allowed the substitution of legal heirs following the death of a party, emphasizing leniency in procedural matte....
The court condoned a 212-day delay in filing a Criminal Revision Application based on the petitioner's financial hardship and ignorance of prior judgments, granting provisional bail during the appeal....
The court emphasized that the duration of custody is a significant factor in considering bail applications.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
