Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
Sujit Narayan Prasad, Navneet Kumar, JJ
Dilip Kumar Sahu, Son Of Late Narayan Sahu – Appellant
Versus
The State Jharkhand – Respondent
ORDER :
Sujit Narayan Prasad, J.
Prayer:
1. The instant intra-court appeal, under Clause 10 of the Letters Patent, is directed against order/judgment dated 16.08.2024 passed by learned Single Judge in W.P.(S) No. 4477 of 2019 whereby and whereunder without deliberating the issues on merit the learned Single Judge has dismissed the writ petition by refusing to interfere with the order passed by the disciplinary authority dated 22.09.1997 and appellate order dated 05.06.2006 solely on the ground of delay and laches, since the writ petition was filed after a lapse of about 12 years of passing of impugned order.
Brief facts of the case
2. Brief facts of the case, as per the pleadings made in the writ petition, which is required for adjudication of lis, reads as under:
3. The petitioner was appointed on the post of Village Level Worker [VLW], now designated as 'Jan Sewak', on 20.10.1986. While working as such in the district of Raidih, Gumla, he was served with a charge-sheet issued by respondent no. 3 on 18.12.1990, on the allegation of dereliction of duty and irregularities in Government work, misleading the higher authorities and violation of Government Rules, to which he replied vide lett
The principle of delay and laches is flexible in cases involving recurring causes of action, particularly in pension matters, and charges of misconduct must be substantiated by assigned duties.
The court emphasized the importance of timely filing of appeals and writ petitions, the inability of successive representations to condone delay, and the limited scope of judicial review in disciplin....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that delay in disciplinary proceedings, violation of natural justice, non-compliance with regulations, lack of reasoning in the order imposing puni....
The court emphasized the necessity of adhering to principles of natural justice in disciplinary inquiries, asserting that findings must be supported by adequate evidence and fair procedures.
Point of law: doctrine of laches in courts of equity is not an arbitrary or technical doctrine. Where it would be practically unjust to give a remedy either because the party has, by his conduct done....
Disciplinary proceedings initiated by an authority subordinate to the appointing authority do not violate Article 311; the standard for punishment must align with proven misconduct.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
