SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Jhk) 996

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
RAJESH SHANKAR
State of Jharkhand – Appellant
Versus
Mahwa Minz – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellants : Sachin Kumar, Ravi Prakash Mishra
For the Respondent: Binod Singh

Table of Content
1. review filed for apparent error. (Para 1 , 2)
2. court's duty to ascertain limits of review. (Para 3 , 6 , 10 , 12)
3. arguments concerning the scope of registration authority. (Para 4 , 5)
4. scope of exercise of review powers. (Para 7)
5. review standards under the cpc. (Para 8 , 9 , 11)
6. jurisdiction regarding society disputes. (Para 13 , 14 , 15 , 18)
7. limits of inspector general's authority under the statutes. (Para 16 , 17 , 22)
8. disputes among society members to be referred to civil court. (Para 24 , 25)
9. review petition dismissed. (Para 30 , 31)

ORDER :

1. The present Civil Review has been filed for reviewing the order dated 19.10.2022 passed by this Court in W.P.(C) No. 3425 of 2022 claiming that there is certain apparent error in the said order.

2. Learned counsel for the review petitioner submits that the respondent namely, Mahuwa Minz had filed a writ petition being W.P.(C) No. 3425 of 2022 for the following reliefs:

(i) For quashing/setting aside the entire result of election pertaining to North Western G.E.L. Church, Ranchi held on 21.11.2021 and published vide letter no. XIII/1-Election-629 dated 04.12.2021 whereby the respondent no. 7 has been elected

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top