Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND, RANCHI
Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi
Nirmal Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Jharkhand – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.
Reference may be made to the order dated 12.07.2024 which is as under :-
At the time of rising of the court, the matter was mentioned by the learned counsel appearing for the O.P. No. 2 [Managing Director, Jharkhand State Mineral Development Corporation Ltd.] on the ground that the personal appearance of the Managing Director is there, as such, the matter was taken up.
2. Learned counsel appearing for the O.P. No. 2 submits that I.A. No. 6963 of 2024 has been filed for extension of time to comply the court’s order.
3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that this is the third I.A. for extension of time and earlier also the time was granted to the O.P. No. 2 and it was clarified that if the court’s order will not be complied, he will remain present before the court and on all these dates, the Managing Director were present.
4. In view of the above, it transpires that the sufficient time has already been provided to the O.P. No. 2 in spite of that, the court’s orders has not been complied as yet. Prima facie, it appears that intentionally the O.P. No. 2 is not complying the court’s order. It further transpires that in two of the interlo
A party's failure to comply with court orders despite multiple extensions constitutes contempt, warranting judicial notice and potential sanctions.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the principles of condonation of delay should be applied with a liberal, pragmatic, and justice-oriented approach, considering the elasticity ....
The Labour Court holds the authority to extend time for disciplinary proceedings beyond the 30-day period post-award enforcement under the Industrial Disputes Act.
The court has the discretion to grant an extension of time for compliance with court directions, but emphasizes the need for expeditious compliance and may impose conditions on the extension.
The court established that the suspension order extending beyond three months without serving a charge sheet was contrary to law and unjustified, constituting a failure of justice.
Compliance with court orders is essential, and extensions may be granted in light of genuine unforeseen circumstances affecting compliance.
The court has the authority to grant an extension of time for the deposit of a substantial amount, and the genuineness of the party's efforts and the value of the offered security can be considered i....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the distinction between delay in filing and re-filing of an appeal, and the impact of interim orders after the final disposal of the proceedings.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
