Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
MR. JUSTICE SUJIT NARAYAN PRASAD, MR. JUSTICE NAVNEET KUMAR, JJ
Etwa Oraon, S/o Bholu Oraon @ Bhulu Oraon – Appellant
Versus
The State Of Jharkhand – Respondent
ORDER :
IA No.11297 of 2024
1. The instant Appeal has been listed for passing appropriate order on the instant Interlocutory Application filed on behalf of appellant under Section 430(1) of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 for suspension of sentence/grant of bail during the pendency of the instant Cr. Appeal (DB) No. 1384 of 2024 in connection with Sessions Trial No.123 of 2015 arising out of Bhandariya P.S. Case No.53 of 2014 corresponding to G.R. Case No.2505 of 2014 against the judgment of conviction dated 14.09.2017 and order of sentence dated 22.09.2017 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge-VI, Garhwa, whereby and whereunder the appellant has been convicted under Section 302 of IPC and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for life and a fine of Rs.5,000/- under Section 302 of IPC and further held that in default of payment of fine the convict would further undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of one year and apart from sentences the appellant has been ordered to pay compensation of Rs.30,000/- to the family of the deceased.
2. The learned counsel appearing for the appellant has submitted that it is a fit case where the prayer for suspension of sentenc
Suspension of sentence is justified when the appeal process is delayed significantly and key witness credibility is in question.
The court upheld the conviction under Section 304(B) IPC, emphasizing that the absence of new grounds and insufficient custody period do not justify suspension of sentence.
A conviction cannot stand based solely on circumstantial evidence without direct eyewitness testimony, emphasizing the necessity for substantive proof.
The court upheld the conviction for gang rape based on credible victim testimony, ruling that contradictions and co-accused acquittals do not automatically justify sentence suspension.
The court emphasized the need to meticulously assess all relevant factors when considering an application for suspension of a sentence for serious offenses like murder.
The court establishes that proper assessment of evidence is crucial for suspension of sentence in serious offences.
Evidence of a prolonged relationship can influence the decision for suspending a sentence under IPC provisions, particularly where the victim's testimony supports the defense.
Suspension of sentence justified due to delays in appeal process and circumstances surrounding eyewitness testimonies.
The court may suspend a sentence pending appeal if circumstances warrant, particularly considering the delay in hearing the appeal and the accused's custody status.
Suspension of sentence requires strong grounds demonstrating a fair chance of acquittal; mere incarceration duration does not suffice for bail.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
