SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Jhk) 1202

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI 
DEEPAK ROSHAN, J.
Majebul Ansari, S/o Late Moinuddin Ansari - Appellant 
Versus
The State of Jharkhand - Respondent 
W.P.(C) No. 3983 of 2023
Decided on : 28-04-2025

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Mr. Saurabh Shekhar, Advocate, Mr. Neil Abhijit Toppo, Advocate
For the Respondent: Mr. Sahbaj Akhtar, A.C. to AAG-III

State authorities cannot arbitrarily deny property rights or issue rent receipts without following due process, violating established judicial precedents.

Headnote:(A) Constitution of India - Articles pertaining to property rights and judicial review - Petitioner sought issuance of a writ directing the State to accept rent for certain lands as per previous court orders. The petitioner contended that refusal to issue rent receipts and placement of lands in a prohibited list were arbitrary and unconstitutional - The court emphasized that the failure to follow established precedents violated the principles of natural justice, particularly the right to be heard. (Paras 2-10)

(B) Property Rights - When land has been historically recognized as belonging to an individual with a mutation entry, the state cannot arbitrarily deny acceptance of rent without due process. The arbitrary action of placing property in a prohibited list without notice or opportunity to be heard was deemed illegal. (Paras 6-9)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner, an heir of landowners, argued that the state has not issued rent receipts for their land since 1985 and unjustly classified it as prohibited, contrary to earlier judgments that affirmed their rights.

Findings of Court:
The court ruled to treat the writ as a fresh representation for addressing grievances concerning rent receipt issuance and prohibited status while ordering compliance within twelve weeks.

Issues: The main issues were the legality of placing the land in the prohibited list and the refusal to issue rent receipts despite earlier court mandates.

Ratio Decidendi: The court reaffirmed the principle that established property rights should not be nullified without due process and highlighted the obligation to adhere to prior judicial rulings to ensure justice.

Result: Writ application disposed of with directions to the respondents to address grievances.

Table of Content
1. petitioner's request for rent receipts. (Para 2 , 3)
2. history of land and rent receipt issues. (Para 4 , 5 , 6)
3. validity of jamabandi records. (Para 7)
4. state's opposition to rent claims. (Para 8)
5. court's directive for fair hearing. (Para 9)
6. conclusion of writ application. (Para 10)

JUDGMENT :

DEEPAK ROSHAN, J.

Heard learned counsel for the parties.

2. The instant writ application has been preferred by the Petitioner praying therein for following reliefs :-

1. For issuance of appropriate writ/writs, Order/Orders, Direction/Directions or a writ in the nature of mandamus directing the Respondents to consider the case of the petitioner in terms of order dated 09.08.2006 passed by this Hon'ble Court in W.P.(C) No. 1119 of 2006, and accept rent and issue rent receipt with respect to the land admeasuring in area 3 Acres having Plot No. 496, khata no. 383, Thana No. 228 situated in Mauza- Pundag, as the Hon'ble Court in the said W.P.(C) No. 1119 of 2006 has clearly directed the respondents for accepting rent and issue rent receipts with respect to Plot No. 496, khata no. 383, Thana No. 228 situated in Mauza- Pundag from the raiyats thereof.

AND

II. For issuance of appropriate writ/writs, Order/Orders, Direction/Directions or a writ in the nature of mandamus directing the Respondents to also consider the case of the petitioner in terms of order dated 03.07.2018 passed W.P.(C) No. 644 of 2016 and analogous cases, and accept rent and issue rent receipt with respect to the land admeasuring in area 1 Acres having Plot No. 492, khata no. 383, Thana No. 228 situated in Mauza- Pundag, as the Hon'ble Court in the said W.P.(C) No. 644 of 2016 clearly directed the respondents for accepting rent and issue rent receipts with respect to Plot No. 492, khata no. 383, Thana No. 228 situated in Mauza- Pundag from the raiyats thereof.

AND

III. For issuance of appropriate writ/writs, Order/Orders, Direction/Directions or a writ in the nature of mandamus directing the Respondents to remove the land admeasuring in area 3 Acres having Plot No. 496, as well as the land admeasuring in area 1 Acre having Plot No. 492, both in khata no. 383, Thana No. 228 situated in Mauza- Pundag, from the Prohibited list as the same are raiyati land of the petitioner which was purchased by his ancestor vide registered sale deed no. 5280 dated 25.07.1951 and registered sale deed no. 4585 dated 22.08.1958 respectively and corresponding jamabandis were also opened in their favor through which they have paid the rent and taxes to the State Government earlier through the concerned Circle Office.

AND

IV. For issuance of appropriate writ/writs, Order/Orders, Direction/Directions or a writ in the nature of mandamus directing the Respondents, to dispose of the representation dated 08.06.2022 made by the petitioner before Respondent No. 3 by passing a reasoned order after taking into consideration the order dated 09.08.2006 passed in W.P.(C) No. 1119 of 2006, as well as the order dated 03.07.2018 passed W.P.(C) No. 644 of 2016, and thereafter start accepting the rent with respect to land admeasuring in area 3 Acres having Plot No. 496, as well as the land admeasuring in area 1 Acre having Plot No. 492, both in khata no. 383, Thana No. 228 situated in Mauza-Pundag, as this issue is no more res integra.

AND/OR

V. For issuance of any appropriate writ/ order/direction, for doing conscionable justice to the Petitioner.

3. As per the pleadings the petitioner is aggrieved firstly, on account of non-issuance of rent receipt with respect to his land having Plot No. 496 (area 3 acres) and Plot No. 492 (1 acres) both having Khata No.383, Thana No. 228, situated in Mouza-Pundag and Secondly, he is also aggrieved as his land has been put in the prohibited list by the concerned respondent authorities.

4. Learned counsel submits that his ancestors have purchased the land measuring in area 3 acres having Plot No. 496, Khata No. 383, Thana No. 228 situated in Mouza- Pundag from Sheikh Mia

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top