Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
DEEPAK ROSHAN
Majebul Ansari, S/o Late Moinuddin Ansari – Appellant
Versus
State of Jharkhand – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
DEEPAK ROSHAN, J.
Heard learned counsel for the parties.
2. The instant writ application has been preferred by the Petitioner praying therein for following reliefs :-
1. For issuance of appropriate writ/writs, Order/Orders, Direction/Directions or a writ in the nature of mandamus directing the Respondents to consider the case of the petitioner in terms of order dated 09.08.2006 passed by this Hon'ble Court in W.P.(C) No. 1119 of 2006, and accept rent and issue rent receipt with respect to the land admeasuring in area 3 Acres having Plot No. 496, khata no. 383, Thana No. 228 situated in Mauza- Pundag, as the Hon'ble Court in the said W.P.(C) No. 1119 of 2006 has clearly directed the respondents for accepting rent and issue rent receipts with respect to Plot No. 496, khata no. 383, Thana No. 228 situated in Mauza- Pundag from the raiyats thereof.
AND
II. For issuance of appropriate writ/writs, Order/Orders, Direction/Directions or a writ in the nature of mandamus directing the Respondents to also consider the case of the petitioner in terms of order dated 03.07.2018 passed W.P.(C) No. 644 of 2016 and analogous cases, and accept rent and issue rent receipt with respect to the lan
State authorities cannot arbitrarily deny property rights or issue rent receipts without following due process, violating established judicial precedents.
Property rights are constitutional rights under Article 300A and cannot be infringed without due process and adherence to natural justice principles.
Inclusion of property in a prohibited list without notice violates the right to property and principles of natural justice under Article 300A, rendering such administrative actions arbitrary and ille....
The right to property is a constitutional right that cannot be deprived without due process, and administrative actions affecting property rights must adhere to natural justice principles.
The decree of the civil court is binding on revenue authorities, and refusal to adhere to it constitutes illegal administrative action.
The inclusion of land in the prohibited list of NGDRS without due process violates principles of natural justice and affects property rights, requiring adherence to legal procedures.
Inclusion of land in a prohibited list without notice violates natural justice, affecting property rights and necessitating adherence to due process.
The right to property is a constitutional right that cannot be deprived without due process and adherence to principles of natural justice.
The inclusion of land in a prohibited list without due process violates property rights and natural justice principles, requiring procedural fairness in administrative actions.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
