SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Jhk) 65

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
Deepak Roshan, J
Birendra Kumar Sinha, Son Of Late Bramhdeo Sinha - Appellant
Versus
The State Of Jharkhand - Respondent
W.P.(C) No. 2233 of 2024 With W.P.(C) No. 1376 of 2024
Decided On : 28-02-2025

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :Mr. Indrajit Sinha, Advocate Mr. Puja Agarwal, Advocate
For the Respondent: Ms. Sunita Kumari, Ms. Sweta Shukla, AC to AAG-II Mr. Sudhanshu Kr. Singh Mr. Rakesh Kr. Roy

The inclusion of land in a prohibited list without due process violates property rights and natural justice principles, requiring procedural fairness in administrative actions.

Headnote:(A) Bihar Land Reforms Act, 1950 - Section 4(h) - Rights to property - Land deemed prohibited by State without proper procedure - Petitioners challenged the Deputy Commissioner's refusal to remove their land from prohibited property list, asserting violation of natural justice - Court held that inclusion in prohibited list affects civil rights and must follow due process. (Paras 12, 15)

(B) Natural Justice - Procedural fairness - Court affirmed right to property as constitutional and human right, impacting enjoyment and transfer rights; held invalid State’s actions lacking procedural adherence - Long-standing land status must be respected unless legally contested. (Paras 10, 11, 16)

(C) Judicial Precedent - References to prior decisions reinforcing property rights and necessity of fair procedure in administrative decisions impacting civil liberties. (Paras 12, 18)

Facts of the case:
Petitioners sought removal of their land from a prohibited list on government portal; the land was previously settled and had transactions indicating ownership.

Findings of Court:
The order by the Deputy Commissioner was quashed, establishing that the petitioners' land should not be on the prohibited list as due process was not followed.

Issues: Whether inclusion of land in prohibited list has civil consequences and if due process was adhered to by the State.

Ratio Decidendi: The court concluded that civil consequences stemming from property inclusion necessitate adherence to natural justice principles; the State failed to follow these protocols.

Result: Writ applications allowed; removal of land from the prohibited list ordered.

Table of Content
1. writ applications for quashing prohibited land order. (Para 2 , 3 , 4)
2. details on land ownership and development agreements. (Para 6 , 7 , 9)
3. state's claim regarding land classification as gair abad. (Para 10 , 11)
4. rights to property include due process and natural justice. (Para 12)
5. court quashes prohibited listing and orders land removal. (Para 13 , 14)

ORDER :

DEEPAK ROSHAN, J.

Heard learned counsel for the parties.

2. These writ applications have been preferred by the petitioners praying for common relief of quashing the order dated 10.10.2023 passed by the Deputy Commissioner, Dhanbad in the respective Misc. cases wherein the Deputy Commissioner has rejected the application of the petitioners regarding removal of their respective land from the list of prohibited property.

3. The petitioners have further prayed for a direction upon the respondent(s) to remove their respective land from the list of prohibited property uploaded on the NGDRS Portal.

4. The matter relates to removal of the respective lands of the petitioners, situated in Dhanbad, from the prohibited list of properties uploaded on National Generic Document Registration System (hereinafter referred to as 'NGDRS').

5. The description of the land of the respective petitioners is as under:

Sl. No.Writ Petition No.Description of Land
1.W.P.(C) No. 2233 of 20241692 Sq. feet of land, in C.S. Plot No. 262, Khata No. 157, Mouza No.51, Mouza-Dhanbad
2W.P.(C) No. 1376 of 202410718 sq. feet or 14 Katha 14 Chattak of land, situated at C.S. Plot No. 262, Khata No. 157, Mouza No.51, Mouza- Dhanbad
3W.P.(C) No. 1510 of 20245 Kathas or 8.25 decimal of land situated at C.S. Plot No. 262, Khata No. 157, Mouza No. 51, Mouza- Dhanbad
4W.P.(C) No. 2201 of 202414.05 Kathas or 23.18 decimal of land, in C.S. Plot No. 262, Khata No. 157, Mouza No. 51, Mouza-Dhanbad
5W.P.(C) No. 2266 of 20243321 sq. feet. or 7.6 decimal of land, situated at C.S. Plot No. 262, Khata No. 157, Mouza No. 51, Mouza- Dhanbad
6W.P.(C) No. 2276 of 20241710 sq. feet and 1692 sq. feet, totalling upto 3402 sq. feet or 7.81 decimal of land, situated at C.S. Plot No. 262, Khata No. 157, Mouza No. 51, Mouza-Dhanbad

6. The brief facts of the case are that the petitioners are raiyats of the respective portion of their land in C.S. Plot No. 262, Khata No. 157, Mouza No. 51, Mouza-Dhanbad which originally belonged to Raja Shiva Prasad Singh of Jharia Raj Estate who settled the land with his wife, Rani Smt. Mandakini Kumari Devi by a permanent Tikuri Settlement Deed No. 2090 dated 27.04.1936 which was registered at Dhanbad Sub-Registry Office.

7. The petitioners are the land owners who had entered into a Development Agreement dated 11.12.2007 with Kalpatru Electricals & Allied Products Pvt. Ltd. (hereinafter, referred to as "the developer"), in terms of which the Developer has constructed a multi-storied residential- cum-commercial building complex on the land in question of the Petitioners and the adjoining lands.

8. When the Developer approached the Sub-Registrar, Dhanbad in the year 2019 to register the sale deeds in favour of the purchasers, the Developer was informed that the registration could not be done because the land in question was listed in prohibited property uploaded on the website https://jharnibandhan.gov.in (hereinafter referred to as "NGDRS Portal").

9. The petitioners therefore instituted respective Miscellaneous Cases before the Deputy Commissioner, Dhanbad who is the Competent Authority as per the notification dated 07.09.2021 issued by the Department of Revenue, Registration and Land Reforms, Jharkhand for removal of their respective land in question from prohibited property uploaded on NGDRS portal, which has been rejected. Hence the writ applications.

10. A counter affidavit has been filed by the State in W.P.(C) No. 1510 of 2024 wherein the main ground taken by the state authorities is that Plot No. 262 is recorded as Gair Abad in the Cadastral Record of Rights.

11. The issue in the present

                          Click Here to Read the rest of this document
                          1
                          2
                          3
                          4
                          5
                          6
                          7
                          8
                          9
                          10
                          11
                          SupremeToday Portrait Ad
                          supreme today icon
                          logo-black

                          An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

                          Please visit our Training & Support
                          Center or Contact Us for assistance

                          qr

                          Scan Me!

                          India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

                          For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

                          whatsapp-icon Back to top