IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
SKS MC Joint Venture – Appellant
Versus
State of Jharkhand – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY, J.
Heard the parties.
2. This Criminal Miscellaneous Petition has been filed invoking the jurisdiction of this Court under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 with a prayer to quash and set aside the order dated 29.08.2022 passed by the learned Special Juge, Economic Offences, Ranchi in Economic Offence Case No.15 of 2018 whereby and where under the learned Special Judge has taken cognizance of the offence punishable under Section 276B read with Section 278B of the INCOME TAX ACT , 1961 against the petitioners.
3. The brief facts of the case is that the petitioner No.2 being the partner and the person responsible for the acts of the petitioner No.1- partnership firm, has failed to pay to the credit of the Central Government, the T.D.S. amount deducted by him, to the tune of Rs.37,64,667/- by the end of the month; after deducting such tax at source, i.e. by 30.04.2015.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the undisputed fact remains that the petitioners have deposited the deducted T.D.S. from the payment made with interest thereon till the date of such deposit on 26.09.2015 but after receipt of such payment with in
Timely payment of T.D.S. with interest precludes prosecution, affirming compounding provisions to prevent harassment and uphold legal efficiency.
Prosecution for failure to deposit T.D.S. is invalid if the amount is deposited with interest before the complaint is filed, emphasizing the need to avoid harassment of compliant taxpayers.
Where compounding of offence is permissible, jurisdiction of High Court under Section 482 Cr.P.C. may not be necessarily invoked by petitioner.
The court affirmed the applicability of the Supreme Court's extension of limitation during the pandemic to compounding applications, asserting that discretion in such matters must be exercised judici....
Prosecution for delayed TDS deposits under Income Tax Act may be quashed when reasonable causes are established; the recent CBDT circular allows for compounding such offences.
A circular cannot override or restrict the application of specific provisions enacted by the legislature and cannot take away a statutory right with which an assessee has been clothed.
The central legal point established in the judgment is that the objections raised for rejecting the compounding application were no longer valid, and the reason for rejecting the review application w....
The court ruled that a compounding application for tax offences cannot be rejected on grounds of limitation or pending conviction after such conviction is set aside.
The court ruled that an offence under Section 276CC is committed immediately after the due date for filing returns, and the actual filing date does not negate the classification as a 'first offence' ....
The prosecution for delays in depositing TDS cannot proceed when the amounts were eventually paid with interest, and valid explanations for the delays were provided.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.