SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Jhk) 1247

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI 
DEEPAK ROSHAN, J.
Dheeraj Kumar Prabhakar, son of Narendra Kumar  - Appellant 
Versus
State of Jharkhand - Respondent 
W.P.(S) No.2253 of 2019
Decided on : 06-05-2025


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr. Indrajit Sinha, Adv., Mr. Arpan Mishra, Adv.
For the Respondent: Mr. Sanjoy Piprawal, Adv.

Recruitment clauses mandating 100% reservation based on local residency in Scheduled Districts violate constitutional provisions, necessitating revision of merit list to ensure equitable opportunity for all qualified candidates.

Headnote:(A) Constitution of India - Articles 13, 14, 16(2), and 35 - Employment opportunities - Clauses in recruitment advertisement providing for 100% reservation for local residents of Scheduled Districts declared unconstitutional and ultra vires; court mandated revision of merit list to address discrepancies in cut-off marks among different districts. (Paras 6-20)

(B) Writ jurisdiction under Article 226 - Authority of High Court to ignore unconstitutional provisions within recruitment policies irrespective of specific challenges to those provisions by candidates. (Paras 8, 9)

(C) Merit-based selection and reservations - Localized residency requirements adversely affecting equal opportunity and meritorious candidates' selection, leading to discriminatory practices in recruitment processes. (Paras 10-11)

Facts of the case:
Petitioners challenged the merit list for Revenue Clerk positions, alleging discrimination due to varying cut-off marks based on district residency, against the backdrop of unfilled vacancies.

Findings of Court:
The court confirmed that the existing merit list would be revised, ensuring that qualified candidates from non-Scheduled Districts are fairly considered for available positions.

Issues: I. Challengeability of a localized selection process; II. Legality of localized residency requirement for employment; III. Enforcement of unconstitutional advertisement clauses; IV. Necessity of uniform cut-off marks; V. Management of unfilled vacancies.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that despite the absence of a challenge to the advertisement itself, unconstitutional clauses cannot be enforced, thus necessitating the revision of the merit list based on merit rather than residency alone.

Result: Writ petition allowed - merit list revised as per court's directions.

Table of Content
1. applicants challenge merit list due to residency criteria. (Para 2 , 3 , 4)
2. recognition of issues for court determination. (Para 5)
3. participation in the selection does not waive rights. (Para 6)
4. local residence requirement violates equality principles. (Para 7)
5. unconstitutional clauses must be ignored by courts. (Para 8)
6. district-wise merit can deny employment to meritorious candidates. (Para 9 , 10)
7. vacancies must address current employment needs. (Para 11)
8. pending vacancies addressed in future recruitment processes. (Para 12 , 13)
9. appointment adjustments for vacancies are allowed. (Para 14)
10. clarification on answering judicial issues. (Para 15)
11. judgment confirms petitioners' merit needs reconsideration. (Para 16)
12. court's directive for reviewing merit list. (Para 17)
13. writ petition granted; merit list to be revised. (Para 18 , 19)

JUDGMENT :

DEEPAK ROSHAN, J.

Heard learned counsel for the parties.

2. The instant writ petition has been preferred by the Petitioners for following reliefs:-

(i) For issuance of an appropriate writ for quashing the Merit List published on 15/10/2018 pursuant to Advertisement No. 3/2017 on the basis of which the Respondents have made appointments for the post of Revenue Clerks in all the Districts.

(ii) A further Writ/order/direction be issued commanding upon the Respondents to revise the Merit List on the basis of uniform cutoff marks for all the districts

(iii) Upon preparation of such revised list if the petitioners are found eligible, their name should be recommended and considered for appointment to the post of Revenue Clerk.

(iv) In the Alternative, consider the name of Petitioners against the vacant seats for the post of revenue clerk that have remained vacant after the issuance of merit list published on 15/10/2018 pursuant to Advertisement No. 3/2017.

3. The brief facts of the case are that an Advertisement bearing No. 03/2017 was published by the Jharkhand Staff Selection Commission (in short JSSC) for the posts of Amin, Revenue Clerk/Revenue Sub Inspector, Junior Division Clerk, Junior Field Investigator and Clerk/Ganak in the Department of Revenue, Registration and Land Reforms in the State of Jharkhand. The total vacancy for the post of Revenue Clerk/Revenue Sub Inspector was 557 posts.

Clause-3(ii) of the Advertisement provides that in 13 Scheduled Districts of the State namely Ranchi, Khunti, Lohardaga, Gumla, Simdega, Latehar, East Singhbhum, West Singhbum, Saraikella-Kharsawan, Sahebganj, Dumka, Pakur and Jamtara, the local residents of the concerned districts only shall be eligible for submitting the application for the posts Amin and Revenue Sub-Inspector in view the Notification No. 5938 dated 14.07.2016 issued by the Department of Personnel, Administrative Reforms and Rajbhasha, Government of Jharkhand.

Clause 15 of the Advertisement provides that there should be publication of the common merit list in their respective categories in terms of the marks obtained in Paper-2 and Paper-3 in terms of Clause 13.5 of the Advertisement.

4. The Petitioners had applied on the posts of Revenue Clerk/Revenue Sub Inspector, Junior Field Investigator and Ganak by indicating the posts of Revenue Clerk/Revenue Sub Inspector as a first preference. The Petitioners had applied in the open Districts consisting of Hazaribag, Palamau, Garhwa, Giridih, Chatra, Ramgarh, Koderma, Godda, Dhanbad, Deoghar and Bokaro. The Petitioner had also given the district-wise preference.

The Petitioners appeared in the examination and the result of the examination was declared and the Petitioners were found to be qualified. The Petitioners were called for the verification of the certificates in between 02.05.2018 to 05.05.2018. The Petitioners submitted their respective certificates. The final merit list was published on 08.11.2018 and the JSSC published different cut-off marks for different districts within the State of Jharkhand for the same posts for which the Petitioners had appeare

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top