SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Jhk) 2161

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
TARLOK SINGH CHAUHAN, ANANDA SEN, RAJESH SHANKAR
Nutan Indwar @ Nutan Indwar, D/o Sukru Kharia – Appellant
Versus
State of Jharkhand – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellants : Mr. Krishna Murari, Mr. Raj Vardhan, Ms. Mitali Raj, Mr. Ritesh Pathak, Mr. Rabindra Nath, Mr. Shresth Gautam, Mr. Yogendra Prasad, Mr. Manoj Tandon, Ms. Neha Bhardwaj, Ms. Sneha Kumari, Mr. Nitish Parth Sarthi, Ms. Chandana Kumari, Mr. Prem Mardi, Mr. Mukesh Kumar Mehta, Mr. Indrajit Sinha, Mr. Amritansh Vats, Mr. Rohit Ranjan Sinha, Mr. Akchansh Kishore
For the Respondents:Mr. Rajiv Ranjan, Advocate General, (State) Mr. Ashutosh Anand, A.A.G. III, Mr. Ashok Kumar Yadav, Sr. S.C. I, Mr. Manish Kumar, Sr. SC II, Mr. Rahul Saboo, GP II, Mr. Mithilesh Singh, G.A. IV, Mr. Jayant Franklin Toppo, GA V, Mr. Piyush Chitresh, AC to AG, Mr. Gaurav Raj, AC to AAG II, Mr. Rakesh Kumar Shahi, AC to SC (L&C) I, Ms. Chaitali C. Sinha, AC to AAG IA, Mr. Rohit, AC to AAG I, Ms. Divya, AC to SC III, For the JPSC & JSSC:Mr. Sunil Kumar, Sr. Advocate, Mr. Sanjay Piprawall, Ms. Rohini Prasad, Mr. Prince Kumar, Mr. Rakesh Ranjan, Mr. Jay Prakash, Advocate

Table of Content
1. court established grounds for reservation requirements in job applications. (Para 1 , 2)
2. appellants argue that caste certificates should be allowed post-deadline. (Para 9 , 10 , 11)
3. court emphasizes cut-off date for submission of eligibility documents. (Para 13 , 14)
4. proper documentation and adherence to rules are crucial for eligibility and selection. (Para 39)
5. final decision cites compliance with existing laws on eligibility for reservation. (Para 53 , 54)

ORDER :

Ananda Sen, J.

1. This Full Bench has been constituted to answer the reference made by a Division Bench in L.P.A. No.64 of 2020 and other batch of cases vide order dated 2nd March, 2023.

THE REFERENCE

2. The issue and the questions, which need to be answered, as framed by the learned Division Bench are as follows: -

A. Whether “Ram Kumar Gijroya” must be applied in every case irrespective of the facts of the case, provided the caste certificate is produced at the time of verification of the documents?

B. Whether Clause 9(gha) in the Advertisement No. 2 of 2016 and a similar stipulation in the other advertisements run contrary to the Constitutional mandate under Article 14, 16 and 335 of the Constitut

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top