Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
Sujit Narayan Prasad, Pradeep Kumar Srivastava
Satyam Iron and Steel Co. (P) Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Central Coalfields Limited through its Chief Managing Director – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. the court's jurisdiction under article 226 facilitates the examination of contractual obligations. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. details of the fuel supply agreement outline both parties' obligations and timelines. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. conditions leading to the cessation of coal supplies establish a breach of agreement. (Para 8 , 10 , 12) |
| 4. the court emphasizes proper adherence to contractual terms for termination. (Para 33 , 60 , 66) |
| 5. the court's final ruling mandates the return of sums paid by the petitioner. (Para 73 , 74 , 94 , 96) |
ORDER :
Sujit Narayan Prasad, J.
Prayer
1. The present writ petition under Article 226 of Constitution of India has been filed seeking therein the following reliefs:
(i) For issuance of an appropriate writ(s)/order (s)/direction(s) or a writ in nature of mandamus commanding upon the respondents to refund/return the bank guarantee amounting to Rs.36,50,000/- (Rupees Thirty-Six lakhs Fifty thousand) forthwith which the petitioner has submitted as security money while executing the Fuel Supply Agreement with the respondent CCL along with 18% interest.
(ii) For issuance of an appropriate writ(s)/ order(s)/ direction(s) or a writ in nature of mandamus co
Proper adherence to termination clauses in contracts is essential; refusal to act on notices can validate claim for refunds.
Retrospective termination of Fuel Supply Agreements is lawful under the Indian Contract Act, provided it follows the terms of the agreement, and contractual disputes are generally not suitable for wr....
The court held that the respondent's demand for compensation was unjustified as no loss was incurred due to short lifting of coal. The court restrained the respondent from invoking the bank guarantee....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that physical verification of the factory premises is not mandatory under Clause 4.4 of the FSA to conclude whether the coal is being diverted.
The respondent-CCL must satisfy itself regarding the authenticity of the end use of coal by calling for/inspecting the documents and by physical verification as per Clause 4.4 of the FSA. The princip....
Approval by the Ministry of Coal for modification and change in coal distribution policy influenced the court's decision to direct the return of the bank guarantee amount to the petitioner.
Parties must comply with court orders regarding coal supply agreements, with confirmed entitlements based on established judicial mandates rather than disputed interpretations.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the appellant did not have an accrued right to lift coal under the Scheme as it did not exercise the option to avail the benefit during the pe....
Writ jurisdiction can be invoked in contractual matters involving public law elements. Principles of natural justice apply to contracts with public law elements. The penalty mentioned in the agreemen....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
