Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
GAUTAM KUMAR CHOUDHARY
Bishnu Kumar Aikat – Appellant
Versus
State of Jharkhand – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
GAUTAM KUMAR CHOUDHARY, J.
1. Plaintiffs are in appeal against dismissal of Title Suit No. 377 of 2007 which was filed for the following declarations:
a. Title over the suit property.
b. Suit property was not the Khas Mahal Lease Hold Property of the Defendant State.
c. Order of mutation passed in Mutation Case No.1614 R 27/07-08 dated 02.08.2007 to be null and void.
d. Perpetual injunction in favour of the Plaintiff and to restrain the defendant from disturbing the peaceful possession of the Plaintiff in view of the lease deed being no.174 dated 04/01/1972.
CASE OF PLAINTIFF
2. The appellants/plaintiffs’ case is that they are lawful owner and have possession over the land and building in question standing over M.S. Plot No. 1360, Sub Plot Nos. A, B, C, D & E measuring an area of 2.06 acres under Municipal Holding No. 237 Lalpur, Hazaribagh Road, Ranchi. The said land was originally recorded in the name of Kaviraj Jamni Bhushan Roy in M.S. records of right in 1929 which was purchased by Fanindra Nath Aikat on 27.08.1931, who came in possession over it. Fanindra Nath Aikat gifted the said property on 13.05.1946 in favour of Mrs. Gauri Rani Aikat and she was recognized as settled
Ownership of leasehold land requires adherence to laws regarding mutation and cannot be unilaterally terminated without due process.
Mutation proceedings are fiscal inquiries and do not determine right, title, and interest in the property. The mandatory requirements under section 14(2) must be adhered to, and disputes regarding ri....
Khasmahal leases confer permanent rights to lessees, including renewal and transferability, and recording of leased land in government khata is impermissible if prior rights exist.
The renewal of a lease requires timely applications and continuous possession; failure to meet these criteria results in loss of entitlement, as established in the case.
The determination of the lease was based on the lessee's breach of lease conditions, and the pending renewal application was directed to be considered by the appellant within 6 months.
Point of Law : Tenant - Unauthorized occupation of Property - Possession of - Possession can be resumed by government only in a manner known to or recognised by law and it cannot resume possession ot....
A landowner's right to mutate property based on a registered sale deed cannot be legally denied without lawful acquisition or evidence of ownership disputes.
The landlord's entitlement to resume land for personal cultivation is subject to the conditions mentioned in Section 33B(5)(b) of the Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948. In cases of join....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
