SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Jhk) 1395

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI 
Arun Kumar Rai, J.
National Insurance Company - Appellant
Versus
Ashok Kumar Ojha, Son of Bashkar Ojha and ors. - Respondents
M.A. No. 325 of 2015
Decided On : 31-07-2025

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :Mr. Manish Kumar, Advocate
For the Respondent:Mr. Girish Mohan Singh, Advocate, Mr. P.A.S. Pati, Advocate

Insurers can recover compensation amounts from vehicle owners if driving license violations invalidate coverage under the Motor Vehicles Act.

Headnote:(A) Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Section 166 - Compensation awarded for death caused in motor accident - Award by Tribunal of Rs. 3,39,000/- with interest @ 9% upheld - Insurance company raised issue of violation of terms regarding driving licence but was partially dismissed - Right to recovery granted to the insurance company against the vehicle owner for not having a valid driving licence for hazardous goods. (Paras 2, 10, 12, 18)

(B) Compensation - Eligibility for compensation under the Motor Vehicles Act for lawful claimants when challenged by insurance companies - Evidence must substantiate all claims made during inquiry proceedings. (Paras 6-8)

Facts of the case:
Deceased was hit by a tanker while crossing the road, leading to his death; FIR lodged against the driver alleging rash and negligent driving. Appellant challenged the compensation awarded to the claimants, particularly the right to recovery due to alleged violations.

Findings of Court:
The award was modified to ensure recovery rights of the insurance company were noted formally.

Issues: Whether the terms of the driving licence were violated, justifying recovery from the owner of the offending vehicle.

Ratio Decidendi: The court confirmed the insurer's recovery rights after recognizing the violation regarding the driving licence endorsement, establishing the importance of proper licensure for hazardous vehicles.

Result: Appeal disposed with modification acknowledging the right to recovery.

Table of Content
1. circumstances of the accident and claims filed (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8)
2. tribunal's award on compensation and payment instructions. (Para 9)
3. arguments regarding insurance policy violations (Para 10 , 11 , 12)
4. court's assessment of evidence and right to recovery (Para 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17)
5. modification of award regarding recovery rights (Para 18)
6. modification of award concerning recovery rights. (Para 19)
7. final orders and directions to the appellant (Para 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24)

JUDGMENT :

ARUN KUMAR RAI, J.

1. Heard Mrs. Manish Kumar, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant – Insurance Company, Mr. Girish Mohan Singh, learned counsel for the respondent nos. 1 and 2 i.e. claimants and Mr. P.A.S. Pati, learned counsel for the respondent no. 3 - Owner.

2. The instant Miscellaneous Appeal has been preferred on behalf of appellant - National Insurance Company, against the award dated 31.03.2015 passed in Compensation Case No. 109 of 2012, whereby the District Judge-III-cum- M.A.C.T., Jamshedpur has allowed the application filed under Section 166 of MOTOR VEHICLES ACT , 1988 and awarded compensation to the tune of Rs 3,39,000/- along with interest @ 9% from the date of filing of the suit till its realization

3. Brief facts of the case is that on 04.09.2010 at about 04:30 P.M. in the evening Nand Kishore Ojha, since deceased was returning after completion of his work as an electrician in Gurudwara and was crossing the road near Balti Factory, then he was hit by a tanker bearing Registration No. JH-05H-7415, as the same was being driven in a rash and negligent manner and he got injured and succumbed to injury on the spot itself.

4. On the basis of statement of Ashok Ojha, father of the deceased, an F.I.R. being Olidih (Mango) P.S. Case no. 365/2010 dated 04.09.2010 under Sections 279 and 304 A IPC has been registered against the driver of tanker having Registration No. JH- 05H-7415. After due investigation, charge sheet has been submitted against the driver of the offending tanker. Copy of aforesaid F.I.R. and charge sheet are also available on record.

5. An application under Section 166 of MOTOR VEHICLES ACT has been filed by the parents of the deceased against the owner of the offending tanker having Registration No. JH-05H-7415 and appellant - National Insurance Company, before the Tribunal at Jamshedpur.

6. In the present case, despite service of notice, owner of the vehicle did not turn up in the inquiry, however, National Insurance Company (appellant herein) participated in the inquiry and also filed a written statement (W.S.) denying the claim of the claimants on various grounds.

7. During course of inquiry on behalf of claimants Kiran Devi, Komal Kumari, Ashok Kumar Ojha and Ashok Behra have adduced their respective evidences and applicants brought on record the pay slip (Exhibit-1), certified copy of F.I.R. (Exhibit -2), certified copy of charge sheet (Exhibit -3) and Xerox copy post mortem report (Exhibit – 4).

8. On behalf of O.P. - National Insurance Company (appellant herein), Vishwajeet Mukherjee and Sunil Kumar have adduced their respective evidences. Appellant - National Insurance Company brought on record the dirving licence (D.L.) verification (Exhibit-A), D.L. verification by D.T.O. (Exhibit- B), photo copy of permit (Exhibit- D).

9. After analyzing the material available on record, learned Tribunal passed an award to the tune of Rs. 3,39,000/- as compensation with further direction that one cheque for 40% of the amount in the name of Ashok Kumar Ojha, another cheque for 40% of the above mentioned amount in the name of Kiran Devi, and the remaining 20% of the compensation in the name of Komal Kumari (sister of the deceased). All cheques are to carry interest @ 9% per annum from the date of claim filing until payment and cheques must be issued within 30 days. If any compensation under Section 140 of the M.V. Act has already been paid, the insurance company may deduct th

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

AI

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top