Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
Mithun Kumar Paswan son of Chetanya Paswan – Appellant
Versus
State of Jharkhand – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY, J.
Heard the parties.
2. This Criminal Miscellaneous Petition has been filed invoking the jurisdiction of this Court under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 with the prayer to quash the entire criminal proceeding in connection with Jirwabari P.S. Case No.126 of 2025 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 190, 109(1), 351(2) of the B.N.S., 2023 and Section 27 of the Arms Act.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the opposite party No.2-informant as well as the victim jointly draw the attention of this Court towards Interlocutory Application No.12857 of 2025, which is supported by the separate affidavits of the petitioner No.2 which has been duly authorised by the other petitioners as well as the opposite party No.2- informant namely Komal Kumari and also draw the attention of this Court towards Interlocutory Application No.13939 of 2025 which is supported by the separate affidavits of the petitioner No.2, which has been duly authorised by the other petitioners also and the victim namely Mithun Paswan and submit that therein it has categorically been mentioned that the part
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
