SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Jhk) 1533

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
SUJIT NARAYAN PRASAD, RAJESH KUMAR, JJ.
NTPC Limited having its registered office at NTPC Bhawan – Appellant
versus
The State of Jharkhand through Principal Secretary, Department of Mines – Respondent
W.P.(C) No. 2756 of 2025 an W.P.(C) No. 3894 of 2025
Decided on : 08-10-2025

Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant :Mr. Ayush, Advocate Mr. Prashant Pallav, Advocate
For the Respondent: Mr. Sachin Kumar, AAG II Mr. Srikant Swaroop, AC to AAG II

The court held that District Mineral Foundation contributions must adhere to statutory rates, reducing the unlawful 30% charge to the prescribed 10%, with excess payments subject to adjustment.

Headnote:(A) Constitution of India - Article 226 - Writ petition seeking relief for reduction in District Mineral Foundation contributions from 30% to 10% as per statutory rules - Petitioner, a public sector entity engaged in power generation, challenged unlawful deductions made by the State. (Paras 1, 16 and 18)

(B) Mining Regulation - DMF contributions must align with statutory provisions outlined in Mines and Minerals (Contribution to District Mineral Foundation) Rules, 2015 and Jharkhand District Mineral Foundation (Trust) Rules, 2016, which dictate a 10% rate. (Paras 9, 10)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner, a Government undertaking, was allotted a coal block under the Coal Mines (Special Provisions) Act, 2015 but faced deductions at a 30% rate from the DMF, contrary to the rules. The petitioner sought corrections after making various representations.

Findings of Court:
The court held that the DMF contribution rate should be adjusted to 10% as per the applicable rules, and the State accepted the need for adjustment of excess contributions.

Issues: The main issues revolved around the legality of the 30% DMF charge and the appropriate rate applicable to the petitioner.

Ratio Decidendi: The court concluded that any unnecessary charges must be corrected in accordance with statutory frameworks, emphasizing the need for the State to adhere to legal requirements for DMF contributions.

Result: Writ petitions disposed of, with directions for compliance by the State.

Table of Content
1. relief sought for dmf contributions (Para 4 , 11)
2. factual background on coal block allocation (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10)
3. acknowledgment of excessive payments (Para 12 , 14)
4. court's direction on dmf contributions (Para 13 , 18)
5. conclusion and order disposition (Para 15 , 16 , 17)

Order :

Sujit Narayan Prasad, J.

1. Reference may be made to order dated 18th September, 2025.

2. In pursuance thereto, Mr. Arava Rajkamal, Secretary, Department of Mines and Geology, Government of Jharkhand has appeared and submitted that since the matter pertain to the reduction of the amount of DMF from 30% to 10%, for which approval was taken from the Department as such some delay has been caused in filing the counter affidavit. Now, the counter affidavit has been filed on merit.

3. However, the Secretary, Department of Mines and Geology, Government of Jharkhand has assured this Court that henceforth he will take care that the counter affidavit be filed as per direction passed by the Court and in case of any failure, the erring officers will be taken to task.

4. The instant writ petition, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, has been filed for the following relief(s):

Prayer made in W.P.(C) No. 2756 of 2025

a. For the issuance of an appropriate writ(s), order(s) or direction(s) for commanding and directing the Respondents to charge and recover District Mineral Foundation (DMF) contribution at the rate of 10% of the royalty in respect of the coal block allocated to the Petitioner which was allotted under the Coal Mines (Special Provisions) Act, 2015, on 08.09.2015 and not at the higher rate of 30% currently being levied.

b. For the issuance of an appropriate writ(s), order(s) or direction(s) for refund or adjust the excess amount of DMF contribution already paid by the Petitioner at the rate of 30% of royalty from the date of commencement of mining operations, on the basis that such deduction is contrary to the applicable statutory rules, including Rule 2(a) of the Mines and Minerals (Contribution to District Mineral Foundation) Rules, 2015 and Rule 6(i) of the Jharkhand District Mineral Foundation (Trust) Rules, 2016;

Prayer made in W.P.(C) No. 3894 of 2025

a. For the issuance of an appropriate writ(s), order(s) or direction(s) to hold that the Respondents collecting charge 30% of the royalty in respect of the coal block allocated to the Petitioner which was allotted under the Coal Mines (Special Provisions) Act, 2015 is illegal and dehors the law including Rule 2(a) of the Mines and Minerals (Contribution to District Mineral Foundation) Rules, 2015 and Rule 6(i) of the Jharkhand District Mineral Foundation (Trust) Rules, 2016 and to further hold that Respondent can charge and recover District Mineral Foundation (DMF) contribution at the rate of 10% of the royalty in respect of the coal block allocated to the Petitioner which was allotted under the Coal Mines (Special Provisions) Act, 2015, on 08.09.2015.

b. For the issuance of an appropriate writ(s), order(s) or direction(s) for Refund or adjust the excess amount of DMF contribution already paid by the Petitioner at the rate of 30% of royalty in excess of 10%, from the date of commencement of mining operations since March 2024, on the basis that such deduction is contrary to the applicable statutory rules, including Rule 2(a) of the Mines and Minerals (Contribution to District Mineral Foundation) Rules, 2015 and Rule 6(i) of the Jharkhand District Mineral Foundation (Trust) Rules, 2016;

Factual aspect:

5. Since similar facts and prayers have been made in these writ petitions, as such for the sake of convenience, the brief facts of the first case, i.e., in W.P. (C) No. 2756 of 2025, is referred as under:

6. The Petitioner herein is a Government of India undertaking engaged in generation and supply of power, and is the allottee of the Chatti Bariatu Coal Mining Project (CBCMP), located in the State of Jharkhand. The said coal block was originally allocated to NTPC by the Minist

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top