Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
PRADEEP KUMAR SRIVASTAVA
Ram Nandan Sahu – Appellant
Versus
Shiv Shankar Sahu – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. factual basis for the landlord-tenant relationship (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 2. trial court's evaluation of ownership and tenant relationship (Para 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17) |
| 3. appellate court's error in reversing trial court's finding (Para 18 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24) |
| 4. final decision on appeal dismissal (Para 25 , 26 , 27) |
JUDGMENT :
Pradeep Kumar Srivastava, J.
1.Heard Mr. Jai Prakash, learned senior counsel for the appellants and Mr. Shubham Sinha, learned counsel for the respondents.
2. The instant second appeal has been preferred against the judgment and decree dated 08.12.2005 (decree signed on 15.12.2005) passed by learned Additional District Judge-I, Lohardaga in Title Appeal No. 04 of 2002, whereby and whereunder, the first appellate court has dismissed the appeal, confirming the judgment dated 23.03.2002 and decree dated 04.04.2002 passed by the learned trial court (Sub Judge-I, Lohardaga) in Title Suit No. 39/1997, whereby the suit of the plaintiff was decreed.
FACTUAL MATRIX
3.The factual matrix giving rise to this appeal in a narrow compass is that original plaintiff – Kaleshwar Sao instituted a suit against Bihar Rajya Pul Nirman Nigam Ltd. and
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
