Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
ANANDA SEN
Suraj Pratap Singh, son of Bhanu Pratap Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Jharkhand – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. factual background regarding the fir and allegations. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. arguments presented by the petitioner and state. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. legal standards for quashing an fir. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 4. analysis of irrelevant penal sections' applicability. (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 5. disposition of the case allowing the writ petition. (Para 15) |
| 6. final conclusion and order of fir quashing. (Para 16 , 17 , 18) |
JUDGMENT :
ANANDA SEN, J.
In this writ petition the petitioner has made the following prayers:
(i) For issuance of an appropriate writ(s) /order(s) and or direction(s), particularly a writ of certiorari for quashing the entire criminal proceedings in connection with FIR being Bariatu PS Case No. 115 of 2024 dated 03.04.2024 registered for offence punishable under sections 341, 342, 406, 409, 420, 448, 354, 504, 506, 509 and 34 of the INDIAN PENAL CODE pending in the learned Court of Sri Shivraj Mishra, Judicial Magistrate, Ranchi.
2. It is the case of the informant that the petitioner along with other persons entered into the house of the informant while installation of AC work was being done. The informant’s husband was not at home and she was with her two chil
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
