Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
PRADEEP KUMAR SRIVASTAVA
Hem Prasad Singh Munda, Son of Late Basant Lal Babu – Appellant
Versus
Srikant Singh Munda – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. factual background of the property dispute. (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. appellate court's observations on evidence and law. (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 14 , 15) |
| 3. arguments regarding the legality of the sale deed. (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 13) |
| 4. legal prohibitions on transfer of mundari khunt kattidari tenancy. (Para 16 , 17 , 18 , 19) |
| 5. judgment concludes dismissal of the plaintiffs' suit. (Para 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24) |
JUDGMENT :
PRADEEP KUMAR SRIVASTAVA, J.
1. Heard Mr. K.K. Ambastha, learned counsel for the appellants and Mr. Ayush Aditya, learned counsel for the respondents.
2. The instant second appeal has been preferred by the appellants, being aggrieved and dissatisfied with the judgment and decree dated 11.10.2004 (decree signed on 19.10.2004) passed by learned 1st Additional Judicial Commissioner, Ranchi in Title Appeal No. 57 of 2000, whereby and whereunder, the appeal has been dismissed and the judgment dated 29.09.2000 (decree signed on 10.11.2000) passed by learned Additional Munsif, Khunti in Title Suit No. 09/1995 has been upheld and confirmed.
FACTUAL MATRIX
3. The Title Suit No. 9 of 1995 was instituted by respondents / plaintiffs for declaration of their right, title, in
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
