Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND
RAJESH SHANKAR
Sansita D/o Dr. Sanjay Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Central Board Of Secondary Education Through Its Deputy Secretary (CONF) – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner seeks to challenge examination cancellation. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 2. arguments focus on unfair means and procedural fairness. (Para 7 , 8) |
| 3. respondent argues importance of examination integrity. (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15) |
| 4. possession of mobile phone vs. actual use. (Para 17 , 18 , 19) |
| 5. court questions consistency of allegations against the petitioner. (Para 21 , 22 , 23) |
| 6. petitioner’s disciplined record supports her case. (Para 24 , 25) |
| 7. judgment quashes cbse's actions and orders result declaration. (Para 26 , 27 , 28) |
JUDGMENT :
RAJESH SHANKAR, J.
1. The present writ petition has been preferred for quashing the order as contained in Memo number CBSE/RO/PTN/UFM/Main/ 10th/7-2025/7506 dated 31.05.2025, whereby the respondent no. 1 has cancelled the Senior Secondary Certificate Examination (SSCE)-2025 of the petitioner in all the subjects also debarring her from appearing in Board’s next year examination, 2026. Further prayer has been made for issuance of direction upon the respondent no. 1 to declare the result of the petitioner for 12th Board examination, 2025.
2. The learned senior counsel for the petitioner submits that the petit
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
