2025:JHHC:22674
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
SUJIT NARAYAN PRASAD, RAJESH KUMAR, JJ.
Rampravesh Gupta @ Ramu Saw @ Ram Pravesh Sao - Petitioner
Versus
The State of Jharkhand through the Chief Secretary Government of Jharkhand - Respondent
W.P.(Cr.) (DB) No.133 of 2025
Decided on : 08-08-2025
Advocate Appeared :
For the Appellant : Mr. P.S. Dayal, Advocate : Mr. Pankaj Kumar, Advocate
For the Respondent : Mr. Deepankar, A.C. to G.P.-III
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. detention order issuance context (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 2. arguments against detention order validity (Para 12 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17) |
| 3. legal principles and statutory provisions (Para 19 , 20 , 21 , 22) |
| 4. subjective satisfaction requirement (Para 31 , 32 , 34 , 39) |
| 5. court's ruling on detention order quash (Para 46 , 47 , 48 , 49) |
JUDGMENT :
Sujit Narayan Prasad, J.
1. This writ petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for quashing the order dated 14.05.2024 passed in Memo No.18/PIT NDPS-23/2024- 3039 and order dated 14.05.2024 passed in 18/PIT NDPS- 23/2024-3041 issued by the Principal Secretary, Home, Prison & Disaster Management Department, Government of Jharkhand, Ranchi, under Prevention of Illicit Traffic in Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1988 (hereinafter to be referred to as the Act,1988) by which the petitioner has been directed to be detained in confinement.
Factual Matrix
2. The brief facts of the case as per the pleading made in the writ petition, which are required to be enumerated, read as under: -
3. It is the case of the petitioner that the order of detention dated 14.05.2024 passed in 18/PIT NDPS- 23/2024-3041, by respondent no.2, shows that the detaining authority has observed that the petitioner is engaged in repeated cases of illicit traffic in narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances which pose a serious threat to the health and welfare of the people and harmful to the society and further that with a view to prevent the petitioner from committing any of the acts within the meaning of illicit traffic and also against the general public especially the younger generation from the use and occupation of the drugs, it is necessary to detain him.
4. It is the further case of the petitioner that the petitioner came to know about his detention, after receiving the letters vide letter no. 239 and 240 both dated 27.06.2024 issued by the Deputy Collector, District General Branch,Chatra (respondent no.5) to the Circle Officer,Chatra(respondent no.7).
5. The petitioner had been implicated in connection with- Chatra Sadar P.S. Case No.123 of 2020 dated 13.05.2020 for offence u/s 17(C), 18(C), 22(C) and 29 of NDPS Act; Chatra Sadar P.S. Case No.01 of 2021 dated 01.01.2021 under Section 18 of NDPS Act; Chatra Sadar P.S. Case No.06 of 2021 dated 13.01.2021 under section 18 of NDPS Act; Itkhori P.S. case No. 210 of 2020 dated 30.12.2020 under section 18 of NDPS Act and Barhi (Hazaribagh) P.S. Case No. 175 of 2007 dated 22.08.2007 under section 15/8 of NDPS Act.
6. Apart from the aforesaid F.I.R., the Respondents lodged some Sanhas against the petitioner, which are as follows:-
(i) Station diary entry bearing Chatra Sadar P.S.. Sanha No-23/2024 dated 17.03.2024 has been lodged by A.S.I. Praveen Kumar, Chatra Sadar Police Station, against the petitioner for opium smuggling activities.
(ii) Station diary entry bearing Chatra Sadar P.S.. Sanha No-24/2024 dated 22.03.2024 has been lodged by A.S.I. Anand Kishore Osga, Chatra Sadar Police Station, against the petitioner and others for opium smuggling activities.
(iii) Station diary entry bearing Chatra Sadar P.S.. Sanha No-21/2024 dated 23.03.2024 has been lodged by A.S.I. Pravesh Kumar Ram, Chatra Sadar Police Station, against the petitioner and others for opium and Brown Sugar smuggling activities.
7. It has been stated that the accused arrested under the NDPS Act, 1985 can be ordered to be released on bail only if the Court is satisfied that there are reasonable grounds for believing that the accused is not guilty of such offence and that he is not likely to commit any offence while on bail.
8. Petitioner has already been enlarged on regular bail by the Hon’ble High Court in Chatra Sadar P.S. Case No.123 of 2020; Chatra Sadar P.S. Case No.01 of 2021 and Itkhori P.S. case No. 210 of 2020.
9. In Chatra Sadar P.S. Case No.06 of 2021, the petitioner has already been discharged from all the charges by the learned trial court in
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.