Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY
Chandrika Singh, son of Late Chaman Singh – Appellant
Versus
Sudhakar Kumhar – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. substantial questions of law framed. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 2. original plaintiff's standing demonstrated. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. legal arguments surrounding the sale deed. (Para 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 4. plaintiff's claims about ancestral property. (Para 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 5. trial court's findings on partition and legality. (Para 18 , 19) |
| 6. appellate court's determination of prior partition. (Para 21 , 22) |
| 7. rights of co-owners and validity of sale. (Para 23 , 24 , 25 , 26) |
| 8. court's conclusion on sale deed's validity. (Para 27 , 28) |
| 9. disposition of the second appeal. (Para 29 , 30) |
JUDGMENT :
Anubha Rawat Choudhary, J.
Heard the learned counsels appearing on behalf of the parties.
2. This second appeal has been filed against the judgment and decree dated 19.02.2004 (decree signed on 28.02.2004) passed in Title Appeal No. 23 of 1995 by learned Addl. District and Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court No. I, Gumla whereby the learned 1st appellate court reversed the judgment and decree dated 22.02.1995 (decree signed on 06.03.1995) passed by learned Sub-Judge-III, Gumla in Title Suit No. 41 of 1990.
3. This appeal was admitted for final hearing vide order dated 18.05.2006 on the following substantial question
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
