IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
SANJAY PRASAD
Mausam Kumar Singh, S/o. Vijay Kumar Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Jharkhand – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
SANJAY PRASAD, J.
All the Criminal Appeals i.e. Cr. Appeal (SJ) No.149 of 2025, Cr. Appeal (SJ) No.198 of 2025, Cr. Appeal (SJ) No.269 of 2025 and Cr. Appeal (SJ) No.364 of 2025 have been heard together and are being disposed of together as they arise by the common F.I.R. dated 17.11.2024 instituted under section 103/3(5) of BNS , 2023 and section 3(1)(r)s) of the Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribe (Prevention of Atrocities) Act by the informant namely Chandan Paswan on account of assault of his son Raja Paswan in the campus of B.I.T MESRA, Ranchi and later on the deceased succumbed to his injuries.
2. Cr. Appeal (S.J) No.149 of 2025 has been filed on behalf the appellant- Mausam Kumar Singh who is a student of 3rd Semester of B.I.T. MESRA Polytechnic College, Ranchi.
Cr. Appeal (S.J) No.364 of 2025 has been filed on behalf of the appellant-Abhishek Kumar who is also a student of 3rd Semester of Diploma in E.C Branch at B.I.T MESRA, Ranchi.
Cr. Appeal (S.J) No.198 of 2025 has been filed on behalf of the appellant-Sahil Ansari who is said to be the pass-out student of B.I.T MESRA and presently pursuing his Mechanical Engineering course in Cambridge Institute of Technology wh
Tehseen S. Poonawalla vs. Union of India and Others
Sanjay Gupta and Ors. vs. State of Uttar Pradesh through its Chief Secretary and Ors.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.