Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
SUJIT NARAYAN PRASAD, RAJESH KUMAR,
Sikandar Mahtha son of Mukund Mahtha – Appellant
Versus
State of Jharkhand the Chief Secretary Government of Jharkhand – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Sujit Narayan Prasad, J.
Prayer in W.P.(Cr.) No.933 of 2024
1. This writ petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for quashing the order dated 13.06.2024 passed in Reference No.18/PIT NDPS-25/2024- 3616 by the Principal Secretary, Home, Jail & Disaster Management Department, Government of Jharkhand, Ranchi, under Prevention of Illicit Traffic in Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1988 (hereinafter to be referred to as the Act,1988) by which the writ petitioner has been directed to be detained in confinement.
During the pendency of the instant writ petition, fresh order was passed on 24.02.2025 by which the detention has been extended for a period of one year from the date of detention which has also been challenged by filing interlocutory application being I.A. No.3449 of 2025 seeking amendment in the writ petition, in the pleading and prayer portion thereof.
The said interlocutory application was allowed vide order dated 03.04.2025.
The amended writ petition has also been filed.
The counter affidavit to the amended writ petition has been filed.
Prayer in W.P.(Cr.) No.1001 of 2024
2. In this writ petition order dated 19.04.2024 passed in
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
