SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Jhk) 1739

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
SANJAY PRASAD, J.
Hotel Birsa Pvt. Ltd., - Appellant
Versus
The State of Jharkhand - Respondent
F.A. No. 146 of 2018
Decided on : 14-08-2024

Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant :Mr.Rajendra Krishna, Advocate:Mr. Krishanu Ray, Advocate Mr. Bibhas Sinha, Advocate
For the Respondent: Mr.P.K. Akhouri, S.C.(Mines)

The civil court lacks jurisdiction to determine land classification as chhaperbandi without executive authorization, reaffirming the principle that only designated authorities can declare changes in land use.

Headnote:(A) Chotanagpur Tenancy Act - Section 258 - Jurisdiction of Civil Court - Suit for declaration of chhaperbandi rights and receipt of rent - Original Suit dismissed due to lack of cause of action; state of land as agricultural as per records - No jurisdiction for Civil Court to declare land chhaperbandi without executive authority - Adjustments and relinquishments of land rights discussed - Evidence not substantiating claims for conversion to chhaperbandi. (Paras 46-58)

(B) Jurisdiction - Duty of revenue authorities versus civil court - Executive authorities maintain jurisdiction to determine land nature - Civil courts cannot usurp this authority. (Paras 50-51)

(C) Evidence and Proof - Plaintiff's claims not supported by documentation or witness reliability - Past use of land has not conferred non-agricultural status. (Paras 40-43, 58)

Facts of the case:
The plaintiff, representing Hotel Birsa Pvt. Ltd., filed for recognition of chhaperbandi rights on land originally acquired for agricultural purposes. Claims were disputed by the state, which maintained the land’s agricultural classification, asserting the suit was non-maintainable and barred by law. Key witnesses from the plaintiff’s side provided documentary evidence, but lacked substantial documentation to prove conversion of land use.

Findings of Court:
The court affirmed dismissal of the suit for lack of cause of action, determining no evidence established an entitlement to chhaperbandi rights, nor did it find jurisdiction for civil courts over the matter.

Issues: The court addressed whether the civil court can maintain jurisdiction in declaring land as chhaperbandi, given the lack of evidence for such a classification.

Ratio Decidendi: The appellate court underscored that executive authorities possess the sole jurisdiction to declare changes in land classification; without their acknowledgment, civil claims are unfounded and non-maintainable.

Result: Appeal dismissed.

Table of Content
1. factual background of ownership and claim (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4)
2. arguments regarding jurisdiction and maintainability (Para 5 , 10 , 18 , 20)
3. court's observations on evidence and issues (Para 7 , 14 , 28 , 46)
4. ratio decidendi on change of land use (Para 17 , 40 , 51)
5. final conclusion dismissing the appeal (Para 58 , 59)

JUDGMENT :

SANJAY PRASAD, J.

1. The present appeal has been filed on behalf of the appellant-Hotel Birsa Pvt. Ltd. through its Director-Prem Rajesh Soy by challenging the judgment dated 26.02.2018 and decree dated 05.03.2018, passed by Shri Niraj Kumar Vishwakarma, then learned Civil Judge (Sr. Division) No. I, by which the Original Suit No. 519 of 2010 has been dismissed.

2. The plaintiff-appellant has filed Original Suit No. 519 of 2010 for grant of the following relief/reliefs.

(i) On adjudication a decree be passed that suit property belonging to plaintiff having chhaperbandi right and plaintiff being a lawful owner is entitled to get receipt of chhaperbandi lagan from State.

(ii) Cost of suit be awarded to Plaintiff.

(iii) Any other relief or reliefs which Your Honour may deem fit and proper be awarded to the plaintiff.

3. The case of the plaintiff, in brief, is as follows:-

(i) The R.S. Plot No. 1361, 1348, 1341 under Khata No.57 and 1336 and 1340 under Khata No. 59 and 174 respectively measuring an area 2.15 acres and the building standing thereon, situated at village- Hinoo, P.S. Doranda, Thana no. 225, District Ranchi is the subject matter of the instant suit, herein after referred to as suit property for the sake of brevity.

(ii) That the Plaintiff is seized and possessed or otherwise sufficiently entitled to the land and building, having chhaperbandi right, aforesaid and also described in schedule below with absolute right, title and interest.

(iii) That as a matter of fact the Director of M/S Hotel Birsa Pvt. Ltd is the member of schedule tribe. The land having chhaperbandi right has been acquired by the Company in the manner as set out in succeeding paragraphs.

(iv) That a piece & parcel of land appertaining to R.S. plot nos. 1336 & 1361 measuring an area 42 decimal and 6 decimal respectively under Khata no. 57 situated at village- Hinoo, P.S. Doranda, Thana no. 225 was purchased by Mrs. Sandhya Kujur, sister of the Director of company vide a registered deed of sale being no. 8554 particulars of which have been duly entered in Book no. 1, page nos. 264 to 276 in the office of District Sub-Registrar, Ranchi.

(v) That likewise a piece & parcel of land appertaining to R.S. plot no. 1361 measuring an area 48 decimal under Khata no. 57 situated at village- Hinoo, P.S. Doranda, Thana no. 225 was purchased by Mrs. Usha Kachhap, sister of the Director of company vide a registered deed of sale dated 06.10.1982 particulars of which have been duly entered in Book no. 1, Page Nos. 133 to 179 in the office of District Sub-Registrar, Ranchi.

(vi) That in the same manner the Director of company namely, Prem Rajesh Soy also purchased a piece & parcel of land appertaining to R.S. plot no. 1361 measuring an area 48 decimal under Khata no. 57 situated at village- Hinoo, P.S. Doranda, Thana no. 225 vide a registered deed of sale, being no. 8555 particulars of which have been duly entered in Book no. 1, page nos. 277 to 289 in the office of District Sub-Registrar, Ranchi.

(vii) That the father of Prem Rajesh Soy had also purchased a piece & parcel of land appertaining to R.S. plot nos. 1348 & 1361 measuring an area 6 decimal and 42 decimal respectively under khata no. 57 situated at village- Hinoo, P.S. Doranda, Thana no. 225 vide a registered deed of sale being no. 8556 particulars of which have been duly entered in Book no. 1, page nos. 323 to 334 in the office of District Sub-Registrar, Ranchi.

(viii) That all the purchasers, named above, were having their respective lands contagious and adjacent forming one block of land.

(ix) That all the purchasers had decided to commence a business of Hotel, Motel and Re

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

AI

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top