Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
SUJIT NARAYAN PRASAD, RAJESH KUMAR
Om Prakash Sinha, son of Sri Birendra Kumar Sinha – Appellant
Versus
Nishi Sinha, wife of Om Prakash Sinha, daughter of Sri Binay Kumar Sinha – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. marriage annulment due to mental illness claims. (Para 1 , 3 , 6 , 8) |
| 2. appellant's arguments against the trial court's judgment. (Para 10 , 12) |
| 3. assessment of evidence regarding mental illness. (Para 19 , 21 , 55 , 74) |
| 4. legal requirements for marriage annulment based on mental disorder. (Para 60 , 67 , 76) |
| 5. judgment dismissal without error found. (Para 83 , 84 , 85 , 86) |
JUDGMENT :
SUJIT NARAYAN PRASAD, J.
1. The instant appeal has been filed under Section 19(1) of the FAMILY COURTS ACT , 1984 against the judgment dated 29.04.2019 passed by the learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Bokaro in Title (Matrimonial) Suit No. 239 of 2012 whereby and whereunder, the suit for declaring the marriage in between the appellant and the respondent as nullity under Section 12 (1)(b) of the HINDU MARRIAGE ACT , 1955, has been dismissed.
2. The brief facts of the case, as per the pleading made in the plaint is required to enumerated herein which reads as under.
3. The marriage of the appellant-husband and respondent-wife was solemnized on 25.04.2012 as per Hindu rites and customs at Bokaro. After marriage, both the parties lived together as husband and wife at Bokaro but they hav
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
