SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Jhk) 1747

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
SUJIT NARAYAN PRASAD, ARUN KUMAR RAI, JJ.
M/s. Kharkhar St – Appellant
Versus
The State of Jharkhand, through the Secretary, Mines and Geology Department – Respondent
W.P.(C) No.2608 of 2025
Decided on : 19-08-2025

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Mr. Sumeet Gadodia, Advocate
For the State : Mr. Sachin Kumar, AAG-II

Renewal of mining leases cannot be arbitrarily denied based on subsequent amendments if the application was filed before the lease expiration, adhering to the legal principles of statutory interpretation.

Headnote:(A) Jharkhand Minor Mineral Concession Rules, 2004; Minor Minerals (Development and Regulation Act), 1957 - Renewal of mining lease - Application for renewal rejected on grounds of amendments in rules preventing renewal post-31.03.2022. Court found rejection arbitrary and not sustained by law. (Paras 1-10)

(B) Statutory provisions - Renewal applications filed during subsistence of lease must be considered irrespective of subsequent amendments limiting renewal. (Paras 22-26)

(C) Judicial discipline - Coordinated judgments must be followed unless solid grounds rendering them incorrect are established. (Paras 8, 10)

Facts of the case:
The appellant filed for renewal of its mining lease for stone boulders prior to the expiry of the original lease but faced arbitrary rejection from authorities under the claim that amendments restricted renewal.

Findings of Court:
The rejection of renewal application was ruled illegal and arbitrary, affirming prior judicial decisions on similar issues.

Issues: Main considerations revolved around legality of the rejection grounded in statutory amendments concerning lease renewal and whether prior judgments should bind current case decisions.

Ratio Decidendi: The court articulated that even with amendments, applications for renewal must be honored if filed during the original lease's validity, reflecting the legal principle of harmonious construction of statutory provisions.

Result: Writ petition dismissed.

Table of Content
1. writ petition for renewal of mining lease. (Para 1)
2. initial facts regarding mining lease status. (Para 2)
3. parties present their arguments and contentions. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6)
4. court's review of issues based on precedents. (Para 7 , 8)
5. final dismissal of the writ petition. (Para 10 , 11)

JUDGMENT :

Sujit Narayan Prasad, J.

1. This writ petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the following reliefs :-

i. For issuance of an appropriate writ/order/direction, including Writ of Certiorari, for quashing order passed by Respondent- Authorities as contained in Memo No. 1722/M dated 18.10.2024 (Annexure-4), wherein application filed by Petitioner for renewal of its mining lease over an area of 1.36 acres situated at Mouza Kharkhar, Thana Nawal Shahi, District Koderma, Thana No. 207, appertaining to Khata Nos. 233, 24, 185 and 278, bearing Plot Nos. 3499(Part), 3500, 3501, 3510, 3514, 3516, 3515 and 3517 has been rejected in a most illegal and arbitrary manner.

ii. For issuance of further appropriate writ/order/direction, including Writ of Mandamus, directing Respondents to consider and consequentially grant renewal of mining lease in favour of Petitioners, pertaining to mining lease of stone boulders over an area of 1.36 acres situated at Mouza Kharkhar, Thana Nawal Shahi, District Koderma, Thana No 207, appertaining to Khata Nos. 233, 24, 185 and 278, bearing Plot Nos. 3499(Part), 3500, 3501, 3510, 3514, 3516, 3515 and 3517 for a period of 10 years commencing from 17.04.2010 to 16.04.2020 and consequentially grant lease in favour of Petitioner over the aforesaid area.

iii. Forissuance of further appropriate writ/order/direction, including Writ of Declaration, declaring that amendment carried out under Jharkhand Minor Mineral Concession Rules, 2004 (for short 'JMMC Rules') vide Jharkhand Minor Mineral Concession (Amendment) Rules, 2017 (Annexure-5), Jharkhand Minor Mineral Concession (Amendment) Rules, 2019 (Annexure- 6) and Jharkhand Minor Mineral Concession (Amendment) Rules, 2020 (Annexure-7) do not prohibit grant of renewal of mining lease, but only provides, inter alia, that any new lease over 3 hectares of land would be granted in terms Jharkhand Minor Mineral (Auction) Rules, 2017 (Annexure-8).

2. The brief facts of the case, as per the pleadings made in the writ petition, required to be enumerated, which read as under:-

i. Petitioner was initially granted mining lease over a piece of land having an area of 1.36 acres situated at Mouza Kharkhar, Thana Nawal Shahi, District Koderma, Thana No. 207, appertaining to Khata Nos. 233, 24, 185 and 278, bearing Plot Nos. 3499(Part), 3500, 3501, 3510, 3514, 3516, 3515 and 3517 for a period of 10 years commencing from 17.04.2010 to 16.04.2020.

ii. Petitioner, prior to expiry of Mining Lease Deed, on 25.12.2019, filed an application for renewal of its mining lease in statutory Form-F and along with the said renewal application, Petitioner enclosed the requisite Challan towards deposit of renewal fee of Rs.5000/-.

iii. Despite the fact that Petitioner filed application for renewal of its mining lease, said application for renewal was not being considered by Respondent-Deputy Commissioner, Kodarma on the alleged sole ground that after amendment carried out by virtue of Jharkhand Minor Mineral Concession (Amendment) Rules, 2017 and Jharkhand Minor Mineral Concession (Amendment) Rules, 2019, there is no provision for renewal of mining lease.

iv. Whenever petitioner contacted the office of Respondent-Deputy Commissioner, Koderma, Petitioner was not informed about the status of mining lease of Petitioner and it was verbally informed to Petitioner that its mining lease application for renewal of mining lease is deemed to have been rejected under law. Under the said circumstances, Petitioner filed a Revision application, being Revision Case No. 26 of 2024 before the Mines Commissioner, Jharkhand. In the said Revision application, statement of fact cu

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

AI

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top