Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
SUJIT NARAYAN PRASAD
Avinash Kumar S/o. Raj Ballabh Sharma – Appellant
Versus
State of Jharkhand – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. factual background of the case. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. arguments for suspension of sentence. (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 3. opposition arguments against suspension. (Para 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17) |
| 4. court's analysis of the previous case and evidence. (Para 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26) |
| 5. court's observations on the issue of parity for bail. (Para 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31) |
| 6. further considerations on the issue of parity. (Para 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36) |
| 7. final conclusion of the court. (Para 37 , 38 , 39) |
JUDGMENT :
SUJIT NARAYAN PRASAD, J.
I.A. No. 10086 of 2025:
1. The instant interlocutory application has been filed under Section 430 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 for keeping the sentence in abeyance in connection with the judgment of conviction dated 21.02.2023 and order of sentence dated 27.02.2023 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge IV, Jamshedpur in Session Trial No. 367 of 2016 arising out of Bi–stupur P.S. Case No. 228 of 2015, whereby and whereunder, the appellant has been convicted and sentenced to undergo imprisonment for life along with fine of Rs. 10,000/- for the offence punishable under Sections 302 /120-B
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
