Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
RONGON MUKHOPADHYAY, RAJESH KUMAR
Bhuneshwar Mahto, son of Shobhi Mahto – Appellant
Versus
State of Jharkhand – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. details of charges and conviction. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 2. testimonies supporting prosecution case. (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 3. accused's denial of charges. (Para 11 , 12) |
| 4. arguments of appellant's counsel. (Para 13 , 14) |
| 5. court's reasoning on evidence and conviction. (Para 15 , 16) |
| 6. legal definitions and application of explosives law. (Para 17 , 18) |
| 7. court's interpretation on ammonium nitrate's legal status. (Para 19 , 20 , 21) |
| 8. affirmation of conviction and sentence. (Para 22 , 23) |
| 9. modification of sentences to run concurrently. (Para 24 , 25) |
| 10. final order of release. (Para 26 , 27) |
JUDGMENT :
R. Mukhopadhyay, J.
Heard Mr. Jyoti Prasad Sinha, learned counsel appearing for the appellant and Mrs. Priya Shrestha, learned Spl.P.P.
2. This appeal is directed against the judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 15.09.2018 passed by Shri Sanjay Kumar Singh No.1, the learned Additional Sessions Judge-XII, Hazaribag in S.T. No. 291 of 2012, whereby and whereunder, the appellant has been convicted for the offences punishable under sections 25(1-B)a/ 26 of the ARMS ACT , sections 3/4 of the Explosive Substances Act and section 17 of the CLA Act and has been s
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
