Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
RONGON MUKHOPADHYAY, AMBUJ NATH
Daya Nidhi Das son of Baidyanath Das – Appellant
Versus
State of Jharkhand – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Rongon Mukhopadhyay, J.
1. Heard Mr. Mukesh Kumar, learned Amicus Curiae, appearing for the appellants and Mr. Manoj Kumar Mishra, learned A.P.P.
2. This appeal is directed against the judgment and order of conviction and sentence dated 18.06.2012 (sentence passed on 19.06.2012) passed by Shri Ranjit Kumar Choudhary, learned Additional Sessions Judge-I, East Singhbhum at Jamshedpur, in Sessions Trial No. 138 of 2010/ Sessions Trial No. 223 of 2010, whereby and whereunder, the appellants have been convicted for the offences punishable u/s 304B/34 and 498A/34 of the INDIAN PENAL CODE (IPC) as also under Section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act and have been sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for life along with a fine of Rs. 10,000/- for the offence under Section 3 04B/34 I.P.C. and in default of payment of fine to undergo simple imprisonment for six months. The appellants have also been sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for two years along with a fine of Rs. 5,000/- for the offence under Section 4 98A/34 I.P.C. and in default of payment of fine to undergo simple imprisonment for four months. The appellants have been further sentenced to undergo rigorous imp
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
