IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
SUJIT NARAYAN PRASAD, RAJESH KUMAR
Prashanti Saha D/o. Late Gautam Sil – Appellant
Versus
Ranjan Saha, S/o. Gour Chandra Saha – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
SUJIT NARAYAN PRASAD, J.
1. The instant appeal has been filed under Section 19(1) of the FAMILY COURTS ACT , 1984 against the judgment and decree dated 13.07.2023 and 21.07.2023, respectively passed by the learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Chaibasa in Original Suit No. 24 of 2023 whereby and whereunder, the original suit filed by the respondent/petitioner has been allowed and the appellant/respondent no.1 was directed to handover the custody of her daughter (appellant No.2 herein) to the respondent/petitioner.
Factual Matrix
2. The brief facts of the case, as per the pleading made in the plaint is required to enumerated herein which reads as under.
3. The marriage between the appellant No. 1 and respondent was solemnized on 12.12.2010, as per provision of SPECIAL MARRIAGE ACT 1954. Out of their wedlock one daughter namely, Adiwitiya Saha was born on 08.05.2015.
4. In the month of August 2018, disputes and differences cropped up amongst the appellant no.1 and respondent and it was not possible for them to lead marriage life peacefully, thereafter an application under Section 13 (i)(ia)(ib) of H.M.A. and under Section 125 of Cr.P.C. for maintenance was filed by appell
Gaurav Nagpal v. Sumedha Nagpal
Rosy Jacob v. Jacob A. Chakramakkal
Thrity Hoshie Dolikuka v. Hoshiam Shavaksha Dolikuka
Nil Ratan Kundu v. Abhijit Kundu
Yashita Sahu v. State of Rajasthan
Gautam Kumar Das v. State (NCT of Delhi)
Shazia Aman Khan v. State of Orissa
K.N. Govindan Kutty Menon v. C.D. Shaji
Arulvelu and Anr. vs. State [Represented by the Public Prosecutor] and Anr.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.