Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
Sujit Narayan Prasad, Rajesh Kumar
Savita Kumari – Appellant
Versus
Ramu Sahu – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
SUJIT NARAYAN PRASAD, J.
1. Both the appeals have been directed to be listed together and as such, are being taken up together.
2. The appeal being F.A. No.183 of 2023 has been preferred by the appellant-wife against the judgment dated 04.07.2023 passed in Original Suit No. 648 of 2017 whereby and whereunder the suit filed by the respondent/husband for dissolution of marriage has been allowed.
3. The appeal being F.A. No.240 of 2023 has been filed by the husband challenging the part of the impugned judgment dated 04.07.2023 passed in Original Suit No. 648 of 2017, whereby and whereunder, the husband has been directed to pay permanent alimony of Rs. 15,00,000/- to the wife.
4. This Court, taking into consideration the aforesaid, is of the view that appeal being F.A. No.183 of 2023 is to be considered first since the outcome of the said judgment will have bearing upon the appeal being F.A. No.240 of 2023, therefore, the appeal being F.A. No.183 of 2023 is being taken up first.
FA No. 183 of 2023:
5. The instant appeal under Section 19(1) of the Family Courts Act, 1984 is directed against the order/judgment dated 04.07.2023 passed by the learned Principal Judge, Family Court,
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
