Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
PRADEEP KUMAR SRIVASTAVA
Dukhi Orain, wife of late Rupdeo Oraon – Appellant
Versus
Kishun Oraon, son of late Litangu Oraon – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. tenant's claim for land ownership. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 2. land ownership and tenant rights discussed. (Para 12 , 14 , 17) |
| 3. jurisdiction of civil courts over land disputes. (Para 18 , 19 , 20) |
| 4. legal standards for tana bhagat claims. (Para 21 , 25 , 26 , 27) |
| 5. final judgment on appeal. (Para 22 , 28) |
JUDGMENT :
PRADEEP KUMAR SRIVASTAVA, J.
1. Heard the arguments of learned counsel for the appellants and learned counsel for the respondents.
2. The instant second appeal is preferred being aggrieved and dissatisfied with reversal of judgment and decree passed by the District Judge, Lohardaga in Title Appeal No.03 of 2002 whereby and whereunder the judgment and decree passed in Title Suit No.35 of 1996 dated 12.09.2001 dismissing the suit of the plaintiff, has been reversed and decreed.
3. The factual matrix giving rise to this appeal is that the original plaintiff, Budhwa Lecha Oraon instituted the Title Suit No.35 of 1996 before the court of Civil Judge Jr. Division, Lohardaga claiming relief(s) for adjudication of right, title and interest over the suit land and to declare the order dated 10.01.1985 passed by the Anchal Adhikari, Kisko in Tana Bhagat Land Restorat
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
