Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
SUJIT NARAYAN PRASAD, ARUN KUMAR RAI
Urmila Mining Traders through its Proprietor-Nilesh Ranjan – Appellant
Versus
State of Jharkhand – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Sujit Narayan Prasad, J.
Prayer
1. This writ petition is under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a direction commanding and directing the respondents particularly the Respondent No. 2 to issue the Letter of Intent (LOI) in favour of the Petitioner for grant of Mining Lease for stone over being consisted for an area of 27.50 acres of land, situated under Mauza-Nawadih and Bandarchakwa within the District of Koderma, since despite the application filed by the Petitioner vide Application No. 21 dated 06.06.2016 along with all the requisites the Letter of Intent could not be issued to him without any cogent reasons irrespective of the fact that the land applied by the Petitioner being declared as protected forest by virtue of notification in the year 1953, which has lost its force in view of the provisions, as contained in Section 30 of the FOREST ACT , after expiry of 30 years and thereafter no further notification has been issued in terms of Section 29 of the FOREST ACT , and presently the applied land would be treated as vacant land of the Government and over which the Petitioner had applied for grant of the Mining Lease in the year 2016, but even then the m
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
