Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
Soumitra Dutt, son of late Shyamal Kumar Dutt – Appellant
Versus
State of Jharkhand – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. the complexity of the criminal proceedings. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 2. arguments regarding the judicial discretion of magistrates. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 3. criteria for taking cognizance of an offence. (Para 7 , 8) |
| 4. ruling on quashing orders and proceedings. (Para 9 , 10) |
| 5. final disposal of the criminal miscellaneous petitions. (Para 11 , 12) |
JUDGMENT :
ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY, J.
1. Heard the parties.
2. Since all the three criminal miscellaneous petitions have been filed in respect of the same F.I.R. vide Lalpur P.S. Case No. 214 of 2018, corresponding to G.R. No. 3463 of 2018, hence all the three criminal miscellaneous petitions are disposed of by this common judgment.
3. These criminal miscellaneous petitions have been filed invoking the jurisdiction of this Court under Section 482 Cr.P.C. with the common prayer to quash the entire criminal proceeding including the F.I.R. in connection with Lalpur P.S. Case No. 214 of 2018, corresponding to G.R. No. 3463 of 2018 registered for the offences punishable under Section 419, 420, 467, 468, 471, 504, 506, 509 & 120B of the Indian Penal Code and in Cr.M.P. No. 1402 of 2019, an additional prayer has been made for quashing the order dated 19.05.2
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
