Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
State of Jharkhand – Appellant
Versus
Baleshwar Paswan, son of Manki Paswan – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY, J.
1. Heard the parties.
2. This acquittal appeal has been filed under Section 378 (1) (5) of the Code of Criminal Procedure by the State against the judgment of acquittal dated 13.12.2005 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court-III, Chatra in S.T. No. 174 of 2002 whereby and where under, the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court-III, Chatra has acquitted the accused persons of the case by giving them the benefit of doubt and discharged them from the liability of their bail bond; after in the impugned judgement only recording the gist of the deposition of all the five prosecution witnesses in paragraph nos. 3 to 7 by dedicating of the paragraph from 3 to 7 to the deposition of one the prosecution witness each and in paragraph nos. 8 and 9, the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court-III, Chatra has recorded the submissions made by the learned counsel for the accused and in paragraph no.10 of the judgment has opined as follows:-
“In that view of the matter all the accused persons, namely Baleshwar Paswan, Balendra Kumar and Dinesh Paswan are hereby acquitted to give them benefit of doubt and also discha
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
