IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
Maya Rani W/O Late Vijay Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State of Jharkhand – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. summary of the factual background of the case. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 2. petitioner's argument against accusations. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. state's opposition to the petitioner's claims. (Para 6) |
| 4. court's analysis on breach of contract and cheating. (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 5. decision to quash criminal proceedings. (Para 11) |
| 6. final conclusion and order of the court. (Para 12 , 13) |
JUDGMENT :
Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.
Heard the parties.
2. This Criminal Miscellaneous Petition has been filed invoking the jurisdiction of this Court under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 with a prayer to set aside the entire criminal proceedings as well as the order taking cognizance dated 26.09.2023 passed by the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Koderma in connection with Complaint Case No.1188 of 2022.
3. The brief fact of the case is that the complainant entered into an agreement with the petitioner for sell of a land for Rs.14,00,000/-. The complainant paid an advance of Rs.1,00,000/- but the petitioner got his land sold to someone else and did not return the money.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner relies upon the judgment of the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India in the case of Sati
Satishchandra Ratanlal Shah vs. State of Gujarat & Another
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.