Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
RONGON MUKHOPADHYAY, SANJAY PRASAD
Dilip Murmu son of Late Kisto Murmu – Appellant
Versus
State of Jharkhand – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. details of the assault and witness accounts. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13) |
| 2. medical evidence regarding cause of death. (Para 14 , 15) |
| 3. accused's denial of involvement. (Para 16) |
| 4. arguments presented by the parties. (Para 17 , 18 , 19) |
| 5. court's findings and reasoning. (Para 20 , 21 , 22) |
| 6. court's verdict and order. (Para 23 , 24 , 25) |
JUDGMENT :
R. Mukhopadhyay, J.
Heard Mr. Rajeeva Sharma, learned Senior Counsel for the appellants and Mr. P.K. Appu, learned APP.
2. This appeal is directed against the judgment and order of conviction and sentence dated 10.05.2012 (sentence passed on 14.05.2012) passed by Shri Shrikant Roy, learned Additional Sessions Judge-1, Pakur in Sessions Case No. 03 of 2008, whereby and whereunder the appellants have been convicted for the offence punishable under Section 302 /149 I.P.C and have been sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for life along with a fine of Rs. 5000/- and in case of non-deposit of the fine amount, they were directed to undergo simple imprisonment for 1 year.
3. The prosecution case arises out of the fardbeyan of Dinesh Marandi recorded on 25.04.2007, in which it has been stated that in
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
