Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
RAJESH SHANKAR
Jatru Oraon, S/o Late Deva Oraon – Appellant
Versus
State of Jharkhand – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. quashing of previous orders regarding land ownership. (Para 1) |
| 2. claims of land ownership based on illegal transfer. (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. respondent's argument on limitation for restoration. (Para 7 , 8) |
| 4. discussion on possession and restoration timeliness. (Para 9 , 10) |
| 5. section 71-a empowers restoration despite no limitation. (Para 11 , 12) |
| 6. court decisions on reasonable time for restoration. (Para 13 , 14 , 15) |
| 7. restoration applications need to be timely. (Para 16 , 17) |
| 8. final dismissal of the writ petition. (Para 18 , 19) |
ORDER :
RAJESH SHANKAR, J.
1. The present writ petition has been filed for quashing and setting aside the order dated 25.08.2008 passed by the Additional Collector, Ranchi-respondent no.5, whereby the appeal filed by Manohar Lal Choudhary (now deceased)- predecessor of the private respondents being S.A.R Appeal Case No.17 R 15/2008-2009 was partly allowed setting aside the order of restoration dated 05.02.2008 passed by the Special Area Regulation Officer, Ranchi under Section 71-A of the Chota Nagpur Tenancy Act, 1908 with respect to the land of the private respondents i.e. respondent nos.8 to 10 appertaining to Khata No.99, Plot No
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
