Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI
Vijay Kumar @ Bijay Das S/o Late Prahlad Das – Appellant
Versus
Bishnu Mahra, Son of Falo Mahara – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. court's jurisdiction regarding service of notice (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. nature of the original suit and claims made by the plaintiff (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. legal provisions regarding consent decrees and limitation (Para 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 4. court’s stance on maintainability based on clever drafting (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 5. bar against new suits challenging consent decrees (Para 13 , 14 , 15 , 16) |
| 6. implications of court's findings on limitation and jurisdiction (Para 17 , 18) |
| 7. final order and its implications on earlier court's decision (Para 22 , 23) |
| 8. closure of the case with directive for future actions if necessary (Para 24 , 25) |
JUDGMENT :
SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI, J.
Heard Mr. Vishal Kumar Tiwary, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners and Mr. Onkar Nath Tewary, learned counsel appearing for the O.P. Nos. 1 and 2.
2. It appears that notice upon O.P. No. 3 has been validly served and in spite of that he has not appeared and with a view to provide one more opportunity to the O.P. No. 3, the matter was adjourned on 25.02.2025, in spite of that he has chosen not to appear. Today, on repeated calls, nobody has responded on behalf of O.P. No. 3, as such, this petition is being hea
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
