Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
ANANDA SEN
Ahmar Rasheed son of Md. Rasheed – Appellant
Versus
State of Jharkhand through The Director General of Police, Jharkhand – Respondent
ORDER :
Ananda Sen, J.
Petitioner, in this writ petition, has prayed for the following reliefs:-
i. For issuance of an appropriate writ(s)/order(s)/direction(s) quashing the order dated 24/06/2017, issued vide memo No.2793 by the Superintendant of Police, Deoghar, whereby petitioner has been dismissed from service.
ii. Be further pleased to quash the appellate order dated 06/03/2019 issued vide memo No.642 by the appellate authority i.e. Deputy Inspector General of Police, Santhal Pargana Region, Dumka, whereby the order of dismissal dated 24/06/2017 passed by the Superintendant of Police, Deoghar has been affirmed.
iii. Be further pleased to direct the respondents to reinstate the petitioner in service with all the consequential benefits, including back wages.
2. The case of the petitioner is that he was appointed as Constable (Constable No. 218) in the Jharkhand Police in the year 2010. While being posted at Deoghar, the petitioner was put under suspension by the Superintendent of Police, Deoghar vide memo No.1386 dated 27.05.2016, on the basis of information of the Officer-in-Charge, Town Police Station, that the Petitioner along with Tinku Kumar, Sumit Kumar Das and the Animal Smuggl
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
