Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI
Shyam Sunder Saw s/o Late Ram Awtar Sah – Appellant
Versus
Babu Nandan Sah, S/o Late Ram Awtar Sah – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. jurisdiction and context of the case. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. appellant's claim on property and arguments. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. plaintiff's suit specifics and legal standing. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 4. trial court's findings and evidence assessment. (Para 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 5. court's dismissal of the appeal and reasoning. (Para 10 , 11) |
JUDGMENT :
SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI, J.
1. Heard learned counsel appearing for the appellant.
2. This Second Appeal has been preferred against the judgment dated 22.07.2024 and decree signed on 02.08.2024 passed in Civil Appeal No.34 of 2022 by learned District Judge-IV, East Singhbhum at Jamshedpur whereby he has been pleased to dismiss the said appeal and affirmed the judgment dated 29.08.2022 and decree signed on 08.09.2022 passed in Original Suit No.44 of 2017 by learned Civil Judge (Sr. Division)-IV, East Singhbhum at Jamshedpur.
3. Mr. Baibhaw Gahlaut, learned counsel appearing for the appellant/defendant submits that the suit was decreed holding that the respondent/plaintiff is entitled to get one third share in the suit property.
4. Learned counsel appearing for the appellant, for admission of the second appeal, only point has argued that the entire property was not
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
